Exposure to valsartan products containing nitrosamine impurities in the US, Canada, and Denmark.
Eworuke, E.; Shinde, M.; Hou, L.; Paterson, J. M.; Jensen, P.; Maro, J. C.; Rai, A.; Pottegard, A.; Scarnecchia, D.; Liang, Y.; Johnson, D.; Platt, R. W.; Lee, H.; Bradley, M. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundFollowing the mass recall of valsartan products with nitrosamine impurities in July 2018, the number of patients exposed to these valsartan products, the duration of exposure, and the potential for cancer remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed the extent and duration of use of valsartan products with a nitrosamine impurity in the US, Canada, and Denmark. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative healthcare data from the US FDA Sentinel System, four Canadian provinces that contribute to the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients, 18 years and older between May 2012 and December 2020 with a valsartan dispensing were identified in each database. Patients were followed from the date of valsartan dispensing until discontinuation. We defined four valsartan exposure categories based on nitrosamine impurity status; recalled generic products with confirmed NDMA/NDEA levels (recalled-tested); recalled generic products that were not tested (recalled); non-recalled generic and non-recalled branded products. In Denmark, recalled-tested category was not included due to absence of testing data. The proportion and duration of use of valsartan episodes stratified by nitrosamine-impurity status. ResultsWe identified 3.3 and 2.8 million (US) and 51.3 and 229 thousand (Canada) recalled-tested and recalled valsartan exposures. In Denmark, where valsartan exposure was generally low, there were 10,747 recalled exposures. Immediately after the recall notices were issued, there was increased rates of switching to a non-valsartan ARB. The mean duration of use of the recalled-tested products was 167({+/-}223.1) and 146({+/-}255.8) days in the US and Canada respectively. For the recalled products, mean cumulative duration of use was 178({+/-}249.6), 269({+/-}397.3) and 166({+/-}251.0) days in the US, Canada, and Denmark, respectively. ConclusionIn this cohort study, despite widespread use of recalled generic valsartan between 2012 and 2018, the duration of use was relatively short and likely did not pose an elevated risk of nitrosamine-induced cancer. However, since products with nitrosamine impurity could have been on the market over a six-year period, patients potentially exposed to these products for longer duration could have a different risk of cancer.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) as Novel Sources for Population-Based Post Marketing Surveillance of Medical Products: A Pilot Study from the FDA Sentinel Innovation Center 93%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 92%
- Sales of over-the-counter products containing codeine in 31 countries, 2013-2019: a retrospective observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 92%
- Stability of extemporaneously compounded amiloride nasal spray 91%
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Inhaled Dry Powder Hydroxychloroquine in Healthy Volunteers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 89%
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Children using Real-World-Data Obtained from Electronic Health Records and Remnant Clinic Samples 89%
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in young Japanese people: A case-control study of the risk of systemic adverse events by a questionnaire surveyShort title: COVID-19 vaccine adverse events in young Japanese 88%
- Adverse events following COVID-19 virus vaccination in Japanese young population: The first cross-sectional study conducted by a questionnaire survey after the first-time-injection 88%
- Quantifying the impact of real-world evidence: the sacubitril/valsartan experience 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents Over Three Decades, 1995-2017: Cross-Sectional Analysis 88%
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 87%
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.