HIV prevention and missed opportunities among people with recently acquired HIV infection: A protocol for a systematic review
Karakosta, A.; Ruiz-Burga, E.; Tariq, S.; Touloumi, G.; Jay Nicholls, E.; Pantazis, N.; Jarrin, I.; Van der Valk, M.; Sabin, C.; Mussini, C.; Meyer, L.; Volny Anne, A.; Carlander, C.; Grabar, S.; Wittkop, L.; Spire, B.; Gill, J.; Porter, K.; Burns, F.; CASCADE Collaboration,
Show abstract
BackgroundIndividuals who have recently acquired HIV represent a unique population because the time frame since HIV acquisition is relatively short and identification of missed HIV prevention opportunities is, therefore, closer to real time and less subject to recall bias. Identifying prevention measures used and missed opportunities for using them, can help stop further HIV transmission. ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to synthesise current global evidence on uptake of HIV prevention methods among people with recently acquired HIV from 2007, the year that the concept of ART as a prevention method was first introduced. Methods and analysisMEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Web of Science databases, will be searched for articles published January 2007 - July 2023. Eligible studies will be those that reported on HIV prevention methods among people with recently acquired HIV. Quality assessment of the studies selected will be undertaken, and reporting of the systematic review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ResultsThe results of the systematic review will be available by the end of January 2024. ConclusionsThe findings will be of key relevance to researchers, healthcare providers including third sector organisations/ community groups and policymakers, as they will offer insight into better understanding of missed or failed HIV prevention efforts and will help ensure future efforts meet the needs of those in need of them.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of retention in HIV care: A protocol for a mixed methods study 96%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 96%
- Association between virtual visits and health outcomes of people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 96%
- Symptoms of common mental disorders and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adults living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study 95%
- The global burden of HIV among Long-distance truck drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Network Strategies to Distribute HIV Self-testing Kits: A Global Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis 96%
- Missed opportunities for HIV testing among those who accessed sexually transmitted infection (STI) services, tested for STIs and diagnosed with STIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Predictors and consequences of HIV status disclosure to adolescents living with HIV in Eastern Cape, South Africa 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities across HIV knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and prevention: results from cross-sectional surveys in 18 sub-Saharan African countries 94%
- Risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes for people living with HIV: a rapid review and meta-analysis 93%
- Understanding the pathways leading to socioeconomic inequalities in HIV testing uptake in 18 sub-Saharan African countries: a mediation analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circumcision for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men: an updated meta-analysis 95%
- Assisted partner services for people who inject drugs: Index characteristics associated with untreated HIV in partners 95%
- Interest in and preference for long-acting injectable PrEP among men who have sex with men, trans* individuals, and cis-gender heterosexual women: a global systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.