Barriers to cascade screening in people at risk of Thoracic Aortic Disease: a mixed methods evaluation from the DECIDE-TAD initiative
Abbasciano, R. G.; Dionne, J. C.; Miksza, J.; Oczkowski, S.; Barwell, J.; Shannon, N.; Grant, R.; Clift, P.; Proietti, R.; Hope, E.; Ahearn, U.; Hewitt, K.; Ghosh, L.; Kaur, R.; Lewis, M.; Cotton, A.; Skinner, L.; Saadia, H.; McManus, G.; Qureshi, N.; Aujla, H.; Page, S.; Sayers, R. D.; Bown, M.; Maltby, J.; Krasopoulos, G.; Cameron, D.; Oo, A.; Elefteriades, J.; Owens, G.; Murphy, G. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCascade genetic and imaging screening for relatives of people with non-syndromic thoracic aortic diseases (NS-TAD) is recommended by guidelines. However, the availability and uptake of cascade screening is low. The aim of this study was to use applied health research methods to identify barriers to screening, and strategies to overcome these. MethodsA cohort study using routinely collected health data evaluated barriers to imaging, genetic testing, and treatment for people with NS-TAD. Delphi consensus exercises and workshops evaluated the screening process and patient experience. Focus groups considered strategies to overcome individual and institutional barriers to uptake. A consensus exercise evaluated the evidence to support cascade screening. ResultsA cohort study of 33,793 patients with a TAD diagnosis between 2013 and 2018 demonstrated barriers to treatment and imaging surveillance in females, non-whites, and people from-low socioeconomic backgrounds. A survey of aortic dissection survivors and relatives in England reported that 33/70 (47%) of aortic dissection survivors who responded had undergone genetic testing, including 10/22 (45%) with a positive family history of TAD. In first- and second-degree relatives 66/150 (44%) and 32/155 (21%) of respondents were offered imaging or cascade genetic testing respectively. Only 19/70 (27%) probands and 20/155 (13%) relatives who responded reported that they were involved in shared decisions about their care. Barriers to the uptake of cascade screening included limited awareness of the disease and genetic aetiology, poor health literacy, concerns about cost-effectiveness of screening with low detection rates, requirements for life-long surveillance, and the management of uncertain test results. The consensus exercise demonstrated that the certainty of the evidence to guide cascade screening was Low or Very Low. ConclusionsBarriers to the implementation of cascade screening in people at high-risk for TAD occur at multiple levels suggesting that a complex intervention is required to improve equity of access.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 94%
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 93%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Original Research; Quality Assessment And Comparative Analysis On The Recommendations Of Current Guidelines On Screening And Diagnosis Of Peripheral Arterial Disease; A Systematic Review 94%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 93%
- Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: A mixed-methods study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 91%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 91%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 94%
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Services 93%
- Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 94%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 92%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.