Back

Long-read RNA-seq atlas of novel microglia isoforms elucidates disease-associated genetic regulation of splicing

Humphrey, J.; Brophy, E.; Kosoy, R.; Zeng, B.; Coccia, E.; Mattei, D.; Ravi, A.; Efthymiou, A. G.; Navarro, E.; Muller, B. Z.; Snijders, G. J.; Allan, A.; Munch, A.; Birhanu Kitata, R.; Kleopoulos, S. P.; Argyriou, S.; Shao, Z.; Francoeur, N. J.; Tsai, C.-F.; Gritsenko, M. A.; Monroe, M. E.; Paurus, V. L.; Weitz, K. K.; Shi, T.; Sebra, R.; Liu, T.; Hoffman, G. E.; Goate, A. M.; de Witte, L. D.; Bennett, D.; Haroutunian, V.; Fullard, J. F.; Roussos, P.; Raj, T.

2023-12-01 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.12.01.23299073 medRxiv
Show abstract

Microglia, the innate immune cells of the central nervous system, have been genetically implicated in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. We previously mapped the genetic regulation of gene expression and mRNA splicing in human microglia, identifying several loci where common genetic variants in microglia-specific regulatory elements explain disease risk loci identified by GWAS. However, identifying genetic effects on splicing has been challenging due to the use of short sequencing reads to identify causal isoforms. Here we present the isoform-centric microglia genomic atlas (isoMiGA) which leverages the power of long-read RNA-seq to identify 35,879 novel microglia isoforms. We show that the novel microglia isoforms are involved in stimulation response and brain region specificity. We then quantified the expression of both known and novel isoforms in a multi-ethnic meta-analysis of 555 human microglia short-read RNA-seq samples from 391 donors, the largest to date, and found associations with genetic risk loci in Alzheimers disease and Parkinsons disease. We nominate several loci that may act through complex changes in isoform and splice site usage.

Published in Nature Genetics (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.