Back

Adaptation to ARF6-depletion in KRAS-driven PDAC is abolished by targeting TLR2

Ghose, R.; Das, S.; Urgel-Solas, J.; Pezzano, F.; Datta, D.; Ghose, U.; Ganez-Zapater, A.; Pardo-Lorente, N.; Espinar, L.; Garcia, L.; Cannata, C.; Ruprecht, V.; Janic, A.; Sdelci, S.

2023-12-02 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.11.30.569405 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metastasis is responsible for nearly 90% of all cancer-related deaths. Despite global efforts to prevent aggressive tumours, cancers such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are poorly diagnosed in the primary stage, resulting in lethal metastatic disease. RAS mutations are known to promote tumour spread, with mutant KRAS present in up to 90% of cases. Until recently, mutant KRAS remained untargeted and, despite the recent development of inhibitors, results show that tumour cells develop resistance. Another strategy for targeting mutant KRAS-dependent PDAC proliferation and metastasis may come from targeting the downstream effectors of KRAS. One such axis, which controls tumour proliferation, invasiveness and immune evasion, is represented by ARF6-ASAP1. Here we show that targeting ARF6 results in adaptive rewiring that can restore proliferation and invasion potential over time. Using time-series RNA and ATAC sequencing approaches, we identified TLR-dependent NF{kappa}B, TNF and hypoxia signalling as key drivers of adaptation in ARF6-depleted KRAS-dependent PDAC. Using in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that knocking down TLR2 with ARF6 significantly reduces proliferation, migration and invasion. Taken together, our data shed light on a novel co-targeting strategy with the therapeutic potential to counteract PDAC proliferation and metastasis. GRAPHICAL SUMMARY O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=120 SRC="FIGDIR/small/569405v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192ac2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4659e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b7e225org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6019aa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.