Back

Multi-task machine learning reveals the functional neuroanatomy fingerprint of mental processing

Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Pan, Y.; Yan, J.; Mao, W.; Xiao, Z.; Cao, G.; Toussaint, P.-J.; Guo, W.; Zhao, B.; Sun, H.; Zhang, T.; Evans, A. C.; Jiang, X.

2025-07-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.11.30.569385 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mental processing delineates the functions of human mind encompassing a wide range of motor, sensory, emotional, and cognitive processes, each of which is underlain by the neuroanatomical substrates. Identifying accurate representation of functional neuroanatomy substrates of mental processing could inform understanding of its neural mechanism. The challenge is that it is unclear whether a specific mental process possesses a functional neuroanatomy fingerprint, i.e., a unique and reliable pattern of functional neuroanatomy that underlies the mental process. To address this question, we utilized a multi-task deep learning model to disentangle the functional neuroanatomy fingerprint of seven different and representative mental processes including Emotion, Gambling, Language, Motor, Relational, Social, and Working Memory. Results based on the functional magnetic resonance imaging data of two independent cohorts of 1235 subjects from the US and China consistently show that each of the seven mental processes possessed a functional neuroanatomy fingerprint, which is represented by a unique set of functional activity weights of whole-brain regions characterizing the degree of each region involved in the mental process. The functional neuroanatomy fingerprint of a specific mental process exhibits high discrimination ability (93% classification accuracy and AUC of 0.99) with those of the other mental processes, and is robust across different datasets and using different brain atlases. This study provides a solid functional neuroanatomy foundation for investigating the neural mechanism of mental processing. One-Sentence SummaryThere exists a functional neuroanatomy fingerprint to underlie the mental process.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.5%
2
Science Bulletin
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.0%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
19
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%