Incidence, prevalence, and survival of breast cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study
Barclay, N. L.; Burn, E. L.; Delmestri, A.; Duarte-Salles, T.; Golazar, A.; Man, W. Y.; Tan, E. H.; Tietzova, I.; OPTIMA Consortium, ; PRIETO-ALHAMBRA, D.; Newby, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in females globally. However, we know relatively little about trends in males. This study describes UK secular trends in breast cancer from 2000-2021 for both sexes. MethodsPopulation-based cohort study using UK primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database and validated in Aurum. There were 5848436 eligible females and 5539681 males aged 18+ years, with [≥]one year of prior data availability in the study period. We estimated breast cancer incidence rates (IR), period prevalence (PP) and survival at one-, five- and 10-years after diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses were further stratified by age. ResultsIR of breast cancer from 2000-2021 was 194.4 per 100000 person-years for females and 1.16 for males. PP in 2021 was 2.1% for females and 0.009% for males. Both sexes have seen around a 2.5-fold increase in PP across time. Incidence increased with age for both sexes, peaking in females aged 60-69 years and males 90+. There was a drop in incidence for females aged 70-79 years. From 2003-2019, incidence increased >2-fold in younger females (aged 18-29: IR 2.12 in 2003 vs. 4.58 in 2018); decreased in females aged 50-69 years; and further declined from 2015 onwards in females aged 70-89 years. Survival for females after one-, five-, and ten-years after diagnosis was 95.1%, 80.2%, and 68.4%, and for males 92.9%, 69.0%, and 51.3%. Survival at one-year increased by 2.08% points, and survival at five years increased by 5.39% from 2000-2004 to 2015-2019 for females, particularly those aged 50-70 years. For males, there were no clear time-trends for short-term and long-term survival. ConclusionChanges in incidence of breast cancer in females largely reflect the success of screening programmes, as rates rise and fall in synchronicity with ages of eligibility for such programmes. Overall survival from breast cancer for females has improved from 2000 to 2021, again reflecting the success of screening programmes, early diagnosis, and improvements in treatments. Male breast cancer patients have worse survival outcomes compared to females, highlighting the need to develop male-specific diagnosis and treatment strategies to improve long-term survival in line with females.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 93%
- Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening 93%
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 96%
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 95%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 94%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 93%
- Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Subtypes among Ghanaian Women: A Population-based Case-control Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a cohort at the Institut Curie hospitals in the Paris area 94%
- Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort 93%
- Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.