Back

Unraveling the Link between CNVs, General Cognition, and Individual Neuroimaging Deviation Scores from a Reference Cohort

fraza, c.; boen, r.; Sonderby, i. E.; Beckmann, C.; Marquand, A.

2023-11-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.11.29.23298954 medRxiv
Show abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) are genetic variants that can have a substantial influence on neurodevelopment, neuropsychiatric traits, and morphometric brain changes, yet their impact at the individual level remains unknown. Common case-control approaches for analyzing CNVs suffer from limitations: they are unable to inform on individual variation between carriers and preclude the study of rarer variants, due to their limited sample size. This cross-sectional study aims to map individualized brain deviation scores in individuals with pathogenic CNVs. We used normative modeling to map neuroimaging features from several large neuroimaging datasets and applied these models to understand the neurobiological profile of CNV carriers in the UK Biobank. We highlight the 1q21.1 distal deletion and duplication, as an example of our individual-level normative modeling-CNV approach. Next, we counted the number of extreme deviations for each participant from the mean and centiles of variation from population reference norms, giving us a combined risk score per participant per imaging modality. We show a high degree of heterogeneity between pathogenic CNV carriers in their implicated brain regions. For example, the cerebellum, brainstem, and pallidum show large negative deviations for specific 1q21.1 duplication carriers. For certain 1q21.1 deletion CNV carriers the caudate and accumbens show notable positive deviations. Finally, we show that negative deviations from these models are correlated to cognitive function. This study marks a starting point in understanding the impact of pathogenic CNVs on brain phenotypes, underscoring the intricacies of these genetic variations at the individual level and providing a means to study the effects of rare CNVs in carrier individuals.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.