Back

copepodTCR: Identification of Antigen-Specific T Cell Receptors with combinatorial peptide pooling

Kovaleva, V. A.; Pattinson, D. J.; Barton, C.; Chapin, S. R.; Minervina, A. A.; Richards, K. A.; Sant, A. J.; Thomas, P. G.; Pogorelyy, M. V.; Meyer, H. V.

2024-02-08 immunology
10.1101/2023.11.28.569052 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity enables the antigen-specific immune responses against the vast space of possible pathogens. Identifying TCR-antigen binding pairs from the large TCR repertoire and antigen space is crucial for biomedical research. Here, we introduce copepodTCR, an open-access tool to design and interpret high-throughput experimental TCR specificity assays. copepodTCR implements a combinatorial peptide pooling scheme for efficient experimental testing of T cell responses against large overlapping peptide libraries, that can be used to identify the specificity of (or "deorphanize") TCRs. The scheme detects experimental errors and, coupled with a hierarchical Bayesian model for unbiased interpretation, identifies the response-eliciting peptide sequence for a TCR of interest out of hundreds of peptides tested using a simple experimental set-up. Using in silico simulations, we demonstrate the varied experimental settings in which copepodTCR yields efficient and interpretable TCR specificity results. We validated our approach on a library of 253 overlapping peptides covering the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, split across 12 pools. A single stimulation with combinatorial pools identified the correct epitope of two TCRs with known specificity and then deorphanized two SARS-CoV-2 associated TCRs shared among a large cohort of COVID-19 patients. We provide experimental guides to efficiently design larger screens covering thousands of peptides which will be crucial to identify antigen-specific T cells and their targets from limited clinical material.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.