Back

Examining the association of live virus neutralisation activity of capillary microsamples and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections: a nested case control study within the Virus Watch community cohort

Yavlinsky, A.; Nguyen, V.; Beale, S.; Wall, E.; Wu, M. Y.; Braithwaite, I.; Kovar, J.; Shrotri, M.; Navaratnam, A. M. D.; Fong, W. L. E.; Byrne, T. E.; Balloux, F.; Abubakar, I.; Cowling, B. J.; Hayward, A.; Aldridge, R. W.

2023-11-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.11.28.23299156 medRxiv
Show abstract

Due to the proliferation of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, most COVID-19 cases are now caused by post-vaccine infections and a substantial proportion are reinfections. While prior research on correlates of protection has focused on the role of anti-spike antibodies, the results of the corresponding antibody assays may not accurately predict the risk of infection with new SARS-CoV-2 variants. In this study, we investigated the association between live virus neutralising antibody activity and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk using self-administered capillary microsample blood tests from VirusWatch participants. The study was conducted during the transition between the dominance of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron BA.1) SARS-CoV-2 variants, enabling us to investigate the association between variant-specific virus inhibition and subsequent infections within each dominance period. Greater inhibition of Omicron BA.1 live virus was associated with a reduction in infection risk during both the Delta and Omicron BA.1 dominance periods. Delta virus inhibition was associated with infection risk reduction during the Delta dominance period, but we found no association between Delta inhibition and protection against infection during the Omicron BA.1 dominance period. Our results are consistent with earlier findings and suggest that variant-specific serosurveillance of immunity and protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection at the population level could inform public health policy in near-real time using inexpensive and accessible home-based testing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
28
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%