Back

Investigating Dopaminergic Abnormalities in Psychosis with Normative Modelling and Multisite Molecular Neuroimaging

Giacomel, A.; Martins, D.; Nordio, G.; Easmin, R.; Howes, O.; Selvaggi, P.; Williams, S.; Turkheimer, F. E.; De Groot, M.; Dipasquale, O.; Veronese, M.; FDOPA PET Imaging Working Group,

2023-11-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.11.27.23299051 medRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular neuroimaging techniques, like PET and SPECT, offer invaluable insights into the brains in-vivo biology and its dysfunction in neuropsychiatric patients. However, the transition of molecular neuroimaging into diagnostics and precision medicine has been limited to a few clinical applications, hindered by issues like practical feasibility and high costs. In this study, we explore the use of normative modelling (NM) for molecular neuroimaging to identify individual patient deviations from a reference cohort of subjects. NM potentially addresses challenges such as small sample sizes and diverse acquisition protocols that are typical of molecular neuroimaging studies. We applied NM to two PET radiotracers targeting the dopaminergic system ([11C]-(+)-PHNO and [18F]FDOPA) to create a normative model to reference groups of controls. The models were subsequently utilized on various independent cohorts of patients experiencing psychosis. These cohorts were characterized by differing disease stages, treatment responses, and the presence or absence of matched controls. Our results showed that patients exhibited a higher degree of extreme deviations ([~]3-fold increase) than controls, although this pattern was heterogeneous, with minimal overlap in extreme deviations topology (max 20%). We also confirmed the value of striatal [18F]FDOPA signal to predict treatment response (striatal AUC ROC: 0.77-0.83). Methodologically, we highlighted the importance of data harmonization before data aggregation. In conclusion, normative modelling can be effectively applied to molecular neuroimaging after proper harmonization, enabling insights into disease mechanisms and advancing precision medicine. The method is valuable in understanding the heterogeneity of patient populations and can contribute to maximising cost efficiency in studies aimed at comparing cases and controls.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
2
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.7%
3
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
10
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
14
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
15
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
16
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Nature Protocols
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
27
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%