Back

Individuality across environmental context in Drosophila melanogaster

Mathejczyk, T.; Knief, C.; Haidar, M. A.; Freitag, F.; McClary, T.; Wernet, M. F.; Linneweber, G. A.

2024-03-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.11.26.568741 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over the past decade, several studies have demonstrated that idiosyncratic animal behaviors remain consistent over long time periods. The consistency of individually variable behaviors over time is often referred to as an animals individuality, or if consisting of multiple traits personality. However, most experimental studies have focused on individuality in a single, well-defined environmental context, whereas it is well-established from population studies that animal behavior is highly context-dependent. The person-situation debate in humans and decades of observations of animal individuality under intrinsically variable natural conditions raise the question of whether and to what extent animal behavior remains consistent across different situations, such as changing environmental contexts. For instance, one individual might be generally more visually guided than another, or rely only on one particular visual cue, or even on this very cue only in a specific environmental context. Here, we use a combination of both well-established and novel behavioral assays to demonstrate the relationship between individual behavior and variable environmental context under tightly controlled laboratory conditions in the model system Drosophila melanogaster. The consistency of three individual traits (termed exploration, attention, and anxiety) was investigated under changing environmental contexts (temperature, visual cues, arena shape), in both walking and flying flies. We find that individuality is highly context-dependent, but even under the most extreme environmental alterations tested, consistency of behavioral individuality always persisted in at least one of the traits. Furthermore, our quantification reveals a hierarchical order of environmental features influencing individuality. We confirmed this hierarchy using a generalized linear model and a hierarchical linear mixed model. In summary, our work demonstrates that, similar to humans, fly individuality persists across different contexts (albeit worse than across time), and individual differences shape behavior across variable environments. The presence of consistency across situations in flies makes the underlying developmental and functional mechanisms amenable to genetic dissection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.6%
2
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
10
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
16
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
28
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%