Back

At matched loads, aging does not alter ankle, muscle, or tendon stiffness

Jakubowski, K.; Ludvig, D.; Lee, S. S.; Perreault, E. J.

2023-11-26 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.11.25.568676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Older adults have difficulty maintaining balance when faced with postural disturbances, a task that is influenced by the stiffness of the triceps surae and Achilles tendon. Age-related changes in Achilles tendon stiffness have been reported at matched levels of effort, but measures typically have not been made at matched loads, which is important due to age-dependent changes in strength. Moreover, age-dependent changes in muscle stiffness have yet to be tested. Here, we investigate how age alters muscle and tendon stiffness and their influence on ankle stiffness. We hypothesized that age-related changes in muscle and tendon contribute to reduced ankle stiffness in older adults and evaluated this hypothesis when either load or effort were matched. We used B-mode ultrasound with joint-level perturbations to quantify ankle, muscle, and tendon stiffness across a range of loads and efforts in seventeen healthy younger and older adults. At matched loads, there was no significant difference in ankle, muscle, or tendon stiffness between groups (all p>0.13). However, at matched effort, older adults exhibited a significant decrease in ankle (27%; p=0.008), muscle (37%; p=0.02), and tendon stiffness (22%; p=0.03) at 30% of maximum effort. This is consistent with our finding that older adults were 36% weaker than younger adults in plantarflexion (p=0.004). Together these results indicate that, at the loads tested in this study, there are no age-dependent changes in the mechanical properties of muscle or tendon, only differences in strength that result in altered ankle, muscle, and tendon stiffness at matched levels of effort. NO_SCPLOWEWC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP C_SCPCAPO_SCPLOWANDC_SCPLOW NO_SCPLOWOTEWORTHYC_SCPLOWWe provide the first simultaneous estimates of ankle, muscle, and tendon stiffness in younger and older adults. In contrast to earlier conclusions, we found that muscle and tendon mechanical properties are unaffected by age when compared at matched loads. However, due to age-related decreases in strength, mechanical properties do differ at matched efforts. As such, it is important to assess the relevance of the comparisons being made relative to the functional tasks under consideration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
10
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%