Back

Tuning of granulopoietic signaling by de novo designed agonists

Ullrich, T.; Pollmann, C.; Ritter, M.; Haaf, J.; Aghaallaei, N.; Tesakov, I.; El-Riz, M.; Maksymenko, K.; Hatskovska, V.; Kandabarau, S.; Klimiankou, M.; Lengerke, C.; Welte, K.; Hernandez Alvarez, B.; Müller, P.; Lupas, A. N.; Piehler, J.; Skokowa, J.; ElGamacy, M.

2023-11-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.11.25.568662 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enhancing cytokine-based therapies by systematically tuning how an agonist associates its receptor is emerging as a powerful new concept in drug discovery. Here, we report the design and characterization of agonists that tune the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) activity, which is central for the proliferation and granulocytic differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. Using design agonists, we study the impact of varying the receptor-binding affinity and dimerization geometry on receptor association, downstream signaling, and cellular response. Hence, we achieved agonists with altered signaling specificities that are hyper-thermostable, can outcompete the native ligand (G-CSF), and bias granulopoietic differentiation over triggering proliferation. Furthermore, the design agonists differentially modulate the kinetics and amplitudes of signal transduction pathways, and gene expression patterns. Unlike G-CSF, they achieve selective activation of gene sets with hematopoietic functions with minimal unwanted effects on immunomodulatory signaling. These findings demonstrate the potential of dissecting the complex G-CSFR signaling, and open up ways for new therapeutic applications for designed cytokines. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=116 SRC="FIGDIR/small/568662v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@af56e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@171920forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12c2c0aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ff7556_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.