Back

Development and validation of a pharmacogenomics reporting workflow based on the Illumina Global Screening Array chip

Gan, P.; Hajis, M. I. b.; Yumna, M.; Haruman, J.; Matoha, H. K.; Wahyudi, D. T.; Silalahi, S.; Oktariani, D. R.; Dela, F.; Annisa, T.; Pitaloka, T. D. A.; Adhiwijaya, P. K.; Pauzi, R. Y.; Hertanto, R.; Kumaheri, M. A.; Sani, L.; Irwanto, A.; Pradipta, A.; Chomchopbun, K.; Gonzalez-Porta, M.

2023-11-25 genetics
10.1101/2023.11.24.568510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMicroarrays are a well-established and widely adopted technology capable of interrogating hundreds of thousands of loci across the human genome. Combined with imputation to cover common variants not included in the chip design, they offer a cost-effective solution for large-scale genetic studies. Beyond research applications, this technology can be applied for testing pharmacogenomics, nutrigenetics, and complex disease risk prediction. However, establishing clinical reporting workflows requires a thorough evaluation of the assays performance, which is achieved through validation studies. In this study, we performed pre-clinical validation of a genetic testing workflow based on the Illumina Global Screening Array for 25 pharmacogenomic-related genes. MethodsTo evaluate the accuracy of our workflow, we conducted multiple pre-clinical validation studies. Here, we present the results of accuracy and precision assessments, involving a total of 73 cell lines. These assessments encompass reference materials from the Genome-In-A-Bottle (GIAB), the Genetic Testing Reference Material Coordination Program (GeT-RM) projects, as well as additional samples from the 1000 Genomes project (1KGP). We conducted an accuracy assessment of genotype calls for target loci in each indication against established truth sets. ResultsIn our per-sample analysis, we observed a mean analytical sensitivity of 99.39% and specificity 99.98%. We further assessed the accuracy of star-allele calls by relying on established diplotypes in the GeT-RM catalogue or calls made based on 1KGP genotyping. On average, we detected a diplotype concordance rate of 96.47% across 14 pharmacogenomic-related genes with star allele-calls. Lastly, we evaluated the reproducibility of our findings across replicates and observed 99.48% diplotype and 100 % phenotype inter-run concordance. ConclusionOur comprehensive validation study demonstrates the robustness and reliability of the developed workflow, supporting its readiness for further development for applied testing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.0%
4
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
8
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
12
Human Mutation
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
22
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%