To what extent could eliminating racial discrimination reduce inequities in mental health and sleep problems among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children?
Priest, N.; Guo, S.; Wijesuriya, R.; Chamberlain, C.; Smith, R.; Davis, S.; Thurber, K.; Mohamed, J.; Moreno-Betancur, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundRacism is a fundamental cause of health inequities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. We aimed to examine the potential to reduce inequities in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childrens mental health and sleep problems through eliminating interpersonal racial discrimination. MethodsWe drew on cross-sectional data from the Speak Out Against Racism (SOAR; N=2818) and longitudinal data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC; N=8627). The SOAR survey was completed in 2017 and the LSAC followed children from 2004 to 2014 in the kindergarten cohort and from 2008 to 2018 in the birth cohort. Exposure was measured by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander or Anglo-European), as a proxy measure of structural racism (SOAR: 10-15 years; LSAC: 4-5 years). Mediator was measured by interpersonal racial discrimination (yes/no) (SOAR: 10-15 years; LSAC: 12-13 years). Outcomes were measured by mental health problems (yes/no) and sleep problems (yes/no) (SOAR: 10-15 years; LSAC: 14-15 years). An interventional effects approach was conducted, adjusting for baseline and intermediate confounders. FindingsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children had higher prevalence of mental health problems (SOAR: 40.1% versus 13.5%; LSAC: 25.3% versus 7.6%) and sleep problems (SOAR: 28.5% versus 18.4%; LSAC: 14.0% versus 9.9%) than their Anglo-European peers. Hypothetical interventions to eliminate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childrens experiences of interpersonal racial discrimination could reduce up to 42.4% of mental health inequities (equivalent to 11.2% absolute reduction) and up to 48.5% of sleep inequities (equivalent to 4.7% absolute reduction). InterpretationTargeted policy interventions that eliminate racial discrimination against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children have high potential to reduce inequities in mental health and sleep problems. Addressing racism and racial discrimination needs a multi-component and multi-level approach directed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. FundingNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed, and ERIC) via The University of Melbourne Library on 05, October 2023, for all publications since inception that used the interventional effects approach to quantify the extent to which intervening on racial discrimination could reduce disparities in health and wellbeing outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations worldwide. This search did not identify any published studies, so we broadened our search to include studies with any population using a refined list of search terms: ("racism") AND (("interventional effects") OR ("causal mediation")) AND (("health") OR ("wellbeing")). This search yielded a total of six studies, with all studies using causal mediation analysis to investigate racial and ethnic disparities (e.g., Black-White, Asian-White, Hispanic-White) in a range of health outcomes including mortality, preterm birth, substance misuse, and dementia among US adults. Mediators examined included hospital type, maternal cardiometabolic risk factors, area deprivation index, psychological distress, racial discrimination in medical settings, and systemic inflammation, with the proportion mediated ranging from 1.5% to 65.8%. However, no studies were identified that investigated the role of interpersonal racial discrimination in mediating racial and ethnic disparities in health among children. Added value of this studyThis study is the first to use an interventional effects approach to estimate the extent to which intervening on interpersonal racial discrimination could reduce inequities in mental health and sleep problems among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. We used both cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys to examine our research question, allowing us to explore common developmental associations within different samples across different study designs. We found that eliminating everyday experiences of racial discrimination could reduce almost half of the inequities in mental health (up to 42.4%) and sleep difficulties (up to 48.5%) experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children compared to their Anglo-European peers. Implications of all the available evidenceOur findings confirm the well-established relationship between exposure to racism and poor mental health and sleep problems among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The consistent benefit observed across cross-sectional and longitudinal studies suggests that targeted policy interventions that eliminate interpersonal racial discrimination have high potential to reduce inequities in mental health and sleep problems experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Critically, interpersonal racial discrimination is only one expression of the wider system of racism that impacts Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Multi-component and multi-level anti-racism actions directed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities are needed to address racism in all its forms to achieve health equity and to realise fundamental human rights.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 92%
- Racism in public health authorities - a scoping review and situational analysis 92%
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the intersection of child protection and public housing: development, health and justice outcomes using linked administrative data 94%
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 94%
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 94%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 92%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 among migrants, refugees, and internally displaced persons: systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of the global empirical literature 92%
- Do children with disabilities have the same opportunities to play as children without disabilities? Evidence from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in 38 low and middle-income countries 91%
- Operationalising social transition in trans and gender diverse youth: a scoping review of definitions and measures 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 92%
- Associations of socioeconomic position and adverse childhood experiences with health-related behaviour changes and changes to employment during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK 92%
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.