Assessing Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy through Comparative Analysis of Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomes
Sayad, S.; Hiatt, M.; Mustafa, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundFacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive weakening of the muscles. While the two types of FSHD (FSHD1 and FSHD2) have distinct genetic causes, they share similarities in their clinical presentations. Both result in muscle weakness, particularly in the face, shoulders, and upper arms. Genetic testing is essential for accurately diagnosing the specific type of FSHD and guiding treatment and management. MethodWe acquired bulk and single-cell gene expression data for FSHD2 from the NIH portal website. Our analysis involved an extensive array of differentially expressed genes, and pathway and gene ontology analysis. Using statistical tests, we identified the top up- and down-regulated genes, and the pathways and gene ontology terms characterizing those genes that exhibited substantial changes across both bulk and single-cell transcriptomes. ResultsThe top 10 up-regulated genes identified in the bulk gene expression analysis represent a diverse range of biological functions, but all are associated with FSHD. In contrast to the bulk down-regulated genes, the single-cell top 10 down-regulated genes are primarily linked to muscle-related functions. These genes, such as ACTC1, ACTA1, MYL11, MYH3, MYL6B, MYBPH, TPM2, MYL2, MYL1, and TNNI1 are integral to muscle contraction and skeletal muscle function. Moreover, all the top 10 single-cell down-regulated pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of muscle dystrophy. Finally, the top 10 down-regulated gene ontology terms are all relevant to the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy. ConclusionsThis study unequivocally demonstrates that single-cell transcriptomics surpasses bulk transcriptomics in elucidating the genes, pathways, biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components associated with FSHD2. While bulk transcriptomics offers a broader perspective on gene expression, single-cell transcriptomics shines in its capacity to unveil cell-specific gene regulation, especially in the realm of muscle-related functions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Postnatal protein intake as a determinant of skeletal muscle structure and function in mice - a pilot study 94%
- Sexual Dimorphism of Skeletal Muscle in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer: A Functional and Molecular Analysis 92%
- Mast cells differentiated in synovial fluid and resident in osteophytes exalt the inflammatory pathology of osteoarthritis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of fibroblast growth factor 2 on muscle precursor cells from mouse limb and extraocular muscle 95%
- Differences in splicing defects between the grey and white matter in myotonic dystrophy type 1 93%
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multipoint Stimulation Motor Unit Number Estimation of the Extensor Indicis and Anconeus after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury 92%
- Feasibility of high-density surface electromyography for the detection of neuromuscular disorders in children 90%
- Post activation potentiation is greater in human triceps brachii versus triceps surae muscles 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced expression of Dystrophin, IGF-1, CD44 and MYH3 in plasma and skeletal muscles including Diaphragm of mdx mice after oral administration of Neu REFIX Beta 1,3-1,6 glucan 94%
- Variant landscape of the RYR1 gene based on whole genome sequencing of the Singaporean population 94%
- Dystrophin and calcium current are decreased in cardiomyocytes expressing Cre enzyme driven by αMHC but not TNT promoter 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.