Back

Assessing Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy through Comparative Analysis of Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomes

Sayad, S.; Hiatt, M.; Mustafa, H.

2023-11-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.11.23.23298813 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive weakening of the muscles. While the two types of FSHD (FSHD1 and FSHD2) have distinct genetic causes, they share similarities in their clinical presentations. Both result in muscle weakness, particularly in the face, shoulders, and upper arms. Genetic testing is essential for accurately diagnosing the specific type of FSHD and guiding treatment and management. MethodWe acquired bulk and single-cell gene expression data for FSHD2 from the NIH portal website. Our analysis involved an extensive array of differentially expressed genes, and pathway and gene ontology analysis. Using statistical tests, we identified the top up- and down-regulated genes, and the pathways and gene ontology terms characterizing those genes that exhibited substantial changes across both bulk and single-cell transcriptomes. ResultsThe top 10 up-regulated genes identified in the bulk gene expression analysis represent a diverse range of biological functions, but all are associated with FSHD. In contrast to the bulk down-regulated genes, the single-cell top 10 down-regulated genes are primarily linked to muscle-related functions. These genes, such as ACTC1, ACTA1, MYL11, MYH3, MYL6B, MYBPH, TPM2, MYL2, MYL1, and TNNI1 are integral to muscle contraction and skeletal muscle function. Moreover, all the top 10 single-cell down-regulated pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of muscle dystrophy. Finally, the top 10 down-regulated gene ontology terms are all relevant to the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy. ConclusionsThis study unequivocally demonstrates that single-cell transcriptomics surpasses bulk transcriptomics in elucidating the genes, pathways, biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components associated with FSHD2. While bulk transcriptomics offers a broader perspective on gene expression, single-cell transcriptomics shines in its capacity to unveil cell-specific gene regulation, especially in the realm of muscle-related functions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
5
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
8
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
11
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
22
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%