Back

Predicting Antibody and ACE2 Affinity for SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 and JN.1 with In Silico Protein Modeling and Docking

Yasa, S. R.; Guirales-Medrano, S.; Jacob Machado, D.; Ford, C. T.; Janies, D.

2024-02-20 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.22.568364 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages derived from Omicron, including BA.2.86 (nicknamed "Pirola") and its relative, JN.1, has raised concerns about their potential impact on public and personal health due to numerous novel mutations. Despite this, predicting their implications based solely on mutation counts proves challenging. Empirical evidence of JN.1s increased immune evasion capacity in relation to previous variants is mixed. To improve predictions beyond what is possible based solely on mutation counts, we conducted extensive in silico analyses on the binding affinity between the RBD of different SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wuhan-Hu-1, BA.1/B.1.1.529, BA.2, XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1) and neutralizing antibodies from vaccinated or infected individuals, as well as the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. We observed no statistically significant difference in binding affinity between BA.2.86 or JN.1 and other variants. Therefore, we conclude that the new SARS-CoV-2 variants have no pronounced immune escape or infection capacity compared to previous variants. However, minor reductions in binding affinity for both the antibodies and ACE2 were noted for JN.1. We discuss the implications of the in silico findings and highlight the need for modeling and docking studies to go above and beyond mutation and basic serological neutralization analysis. Future research in this area will benefit from increased structural analyses of memory B-cell derived antibodies and should emphasize the importance of choosing appropriate samples for in silico studies to assess protection provided by vaccination and infection. More-over, the fitness benefits of genomic variation outside of the RBD of BA.2.86 and JN.1 need to be investigated. This research contributes to understanding the BA.2.86 and JN.1 variants potential impact on public health. Taken together, this work introduces a paradigm for functional genomic epidemiology in ongoing efforts to combat the evolving SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and prepare for other hazards.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
2
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.6%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.8%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
8
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
13
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
19
Virus Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
21
Virologica Sinica
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
25
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%