Back

Deep Learning Model Imputes Missing Stains in Multiplex Images

Shaban, M.; Lassoued, W.; Canubas, K.; Bailey, S.; Liu, Y.; Allen, C.; Strauss, J.; Gulley, J. L.; Jiang, S.; Mahmood, F.; Zaki, G.; Sater, H. A.

2023-11-22 pathology
10.1101/2023.11.21.568088 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiplex staining enables simultaneous detection of multiple protein markers within a tissue sample. However, the increased marker count increased the likelihood of staining and imaging failure, leading to higher resource usage in multiplex staining and imaging. We address this by proposing a deep learning-based MArker imputation model for multipleX IMages (MAXIM) that accurately impute protein markers by leveraging latent biological relationships between markers. The models imputation ability is extensively evaluated at pixel and cell levels across various cancer types. Additionally, we present a comparison between imputed and actual marker images within the context of a downstream cell classification task. The MAXIM models interpretability is enhanced by gaining insights into the contribution of individual markers in the imputation process. In practice, MAXIM can reduce the cost and time of multiplex staining and image acquisition by accurately imputing protein markers affected by staining issues.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
17
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
23
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%