The role of systemic therapies in current and emerging opportunities for de-intensification in melanoma: a scoping review protocol
Soon, J. A.; Franchini, F.; IJzerman, M. J.; McArthur, G. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to identify the role of systemic therapies in current and emerging opportunities to de-intensify systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma. It will also seek to comment on the proportion of studies that include patient-reported outcomes and quality of life measures. IntroductionWith healthcare costs rising, focus is shifting towards maximising health outcomes per dollar. One approach to optimising value is through de-intensification, which is the rationalisation of routine treatment without compromising patient outcomes. Since 2013, successful clinical trials of high-cost immune checkpoint, BRAF and MEK inhibition have led to these drugs becoming ubiquitous in melanoma management. Pipeline therapies such as relatlimab and Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) therapy are expected to have a similar or even greater cost. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant and response-directed strategies will be identified as well as the emerging potential of prognostic and predictive tools. Inclusion criteriaThis review aims to include studies of adult patients with cutaneous melanoma that report on de-escalation or de-intensification of internationally accepted standard-of-care systemic therapies or the use of systemic therapies to de-intensify subsequent surgery or radiotherapy. Systemic treatment across any stage of disease will be considered. A full-text English-language version must be available for a study to be eligible. MethodsA systematic search strategy has been developed for MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2023. Additional texts will be sourced from grey literature, Google Scholar and reference scanning. Two authors will screen abstracts and full texts facilitated by the Covidence software. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. The first author (JS) will perform data extraction whilst a second author (FF) will review a random selection of papers to ensure consistent interpretation. De-intensification strategies will be categorised by concept, potential impact on resource utilisation and patient outcomes, and strength of evidence. Data will be synthesised qualitatively and quantitatively. Results will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The results of this scoping review will directly inform a melanoma consumer and clinician survey exploring their perspectives on de-intensification strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 91%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 91%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Review 91%
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 90%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- CD38hiCD19dim cells in lymph nodes predict favorable prognosis in patients with stage III melanoma receiving adjuvant PD-1-blockade 94%
- Meta-Analysis of Adenoviral p53 Gene Therapy Clinical Trials in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 91%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 91%
- Wound Complications Following Surgery to the Lymph Nodes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 93%
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 91%
- Updated Results of 3,050 Non-melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions in 1725 Patients Treated with High Resolution Dermal Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Radiotherapy, A Multi-institutional Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.