Unexpected suppression of neural responses to natural foreground versus background sounds in auditory cortex
Hamersky, G. R.; Shaheen, L. A.; Espejo, M. L.; Wingert, J. C.; David, S. V.
Show abstract
In everyday hearing, listeners encounter complex auditory scenes containing overlapping sounds that must be grouped into meaningful sources, or streamed, to be perceived accurately. A common example of this problem is the perception of a behaviorally relevant foreground stimulus (speech, vocalizations) in complex background noise (environmental, machine noise). Studies using a foreground/background contrast have shown that high-order areas of auditory cortex in humans pre-attentively form an enhanced representation of the foreground over background stimulus. Achieving this invariant foreground representation requires identifying and grouping the features that comprise the background noise so that they can be removed from the representation of the foreground. To study the cortical computations underlying representation of concurrent background (BG) and foreground (FG) stimuli, we recorded single unit responses in the auditory cortex (AC) of ferrets during presentation of natural sound excerpts from these two categories. In primary and secondary AC, we found overall suppression of responses when BGs and FGs were presented concurrently relative to the sum of responses to the same stimuli in isolation. Surprisingly, and in contrast to percepts that emphasize dynamic FGs, responses to FG sounds were suppressed relative to the paired BG sound. The degree of relative FG suppression could be explained by spectro-temporal statistics unique to each natural sound. Moreover, systematic degradation of the same spectro-temporal features decreased FG suppression as the sound categories became progressively less statistically distinct. The strongly suppressed representation of FG sounds in single units of AC in the presence of BG sound reveals a novel insight into how complex acoustic scenes are encoded at early stages of auditory processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct cortical populations drive multisensory modulation of segregated auditory sources 98%
- Joint population coding and temporal coherence link an attended talker's voice and location features in naturalistic multi-talker scenes. 97%
- Disentangling temporal and rate codes in primate somatosensory cortex 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.