Optimising machine learning prediction of minimum inhibitory concentrations in Klebsiella pneumoniae
Biffignandi, G. B.; Chindelevitch, L.; Corbella, M.; Feil, E. J.; Sassera, D.; Lees, J.
Show abstract
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) are the gold standard for quantitatively measuring antibiotic resistance. However, lab-based MIC determination can be time-consuming and suffers from low reproducibility, and interpretation as sensitive or resistant relies on guidelines which change over time. Genome sequencing and machine learning promise to allow in-silico MIC prediction as an alternative approach which overcomes some of these difficulties, albeit the interpretation of MIC is still needed. Nevertheless, precisely how we should handle MIC data when dealing with predictive models remains unclear, since they are measured semi-quantitatively, with varying resolution, and are typically also left- and right-censored within varying ranges. We therefore investigated genome-based prediction of MICs in the pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae using 4367 genomes with both simulated semi-quantitative traits and real MICs. As we were focused on clinical interpretation, we used interpretable rather than black-box machine learning models, namely, Elastic Net, Random Forests, and linear mixed models. Simulated traits were generated accounting for oligogenic, polygenic, and homoplastic genetic effects with different levels of heritability. Then we assessed how model prediction accuracy was affected when MICs were framed as regression and classification. Our results showed that treating the MICs differently depending on the number of concentration levels of antibiotic available was the most promising learning strategy. Specifically, to optimise both prediction accuracy and inference of the correct causal variants, we recommend considering the MICs as continuous and framing the learning problem as a regression when the number of observed antibiotic concentration levels is large, whereas with a smaller number of concentration levels they should be treated as a categorical variable and the learning problem should be framed as a classification. Our findings also underline how predictive models can be improved when prior biological knowledge is taken into account, due to the varying genetic architecture of each antibiotic resistance trait. Finally, we emphasise that incrementing the population database is pivotal for the future clinical implementation of these models to support routine machine-learning based diagnostics. Data SummaryThe scripts used to run and fit the models can be found at https://github.com/gbatbiff/Kpneu_MIC_prediction. The Illumina sequences from Thorpe et al. are available from the European Nucleotide Archive under accession PRJEB27342. All the other genomes are available on https://www.bv-brc.org/ database. Impact statementKlebsiella pneumoniae is a leading cause of hospital and community acquired infections worldwide, highly contributing to the global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Ordinary methods to assess antibiotic resistance are not always satisfactory, and may not be effective in terms of costs and delays, so robust methods able to accurately predict AMR are increasingly needed. Genome-based prediction of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) through machine learning methods is a promising tool to assist clinical diagnosis, also offsetting phenotypic MIC discordance between the different culture-based assays. However, benchmarking predictive models against phenotypic data is problematic due to inconsistencies in the way these data are generated and how they should be handled remains unclear. In this work, we focused on genome-based prediction of MIC and evaluated the performance of interpretable machine learning models across different genetic architectures and data encodings. Our workflow highlighted how MICs need to be treated as different types of data depending on the method used to measure them, in particular considering each antibiotic separately. Our findings shed further light on the factors affecting model performance, paving the way to future improvements of antibiotic resistance prediction.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis of Variability in TnSeq Data Across Conditions Using Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression 95%
- MSA: Reproducible mutational signature attribution with confidence based on simulations 93%
- Random Walk with Restart on multilayer networks: from node prioritisation to supervised link prediction and beyond 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive evaluation of methods for differential expression analysis of metatranscriptomics data 94%
- kTWAS: integrating kernel-machine with transcriptome-wide association studies improves statistical power and reveals novel genes 93%
- Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms on the microbial strain-specific AMP prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An accurate and interpretable model for antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli from livestock and companion animal species 95%
- Two-step multi-omics modelling of drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines to identify driving mechanisms 93%
- DeLUCS: Deep Learning for Unsupervised Clustering of DNA Sequences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.