Back

A DNA condensation code for linker histones

Watson, M.; Sabirova, D.; Hardy, M. C.; Pan, Y.; Yates, H.; Wright, C. J.; Chan, W. H.; Destan, E.; Stott, K.

2023-11-21 biophysics
10.1101/2023.11.20.567813 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Linker histones play an essential role in chromatin packaging by facilitating compaction of the 11-nm fibre of nucleosomal "beads on a string". The result is a heterogeneous condensed state with local properties that range from dynamic, irregular and liquid-like, to stable and regular structures (the 30-nm fibre), which in turn impact chromatin-dependent activities at a fundamental level. The properties of the condensed state depend on the type of linker histone, particularly on the highly disordered C-terminal tail, which is the most variable region of the protein, both between species, and within the various subtypes and cell-type specific variants of a given organism. We have developed an in-vitro model system comprising linker histone tail and linker DNA, which although very minimal, displays surprisingly complex behaviour, and is sufficient to model the known states of linker-histone-condensed chromatin: disordered "fuzzy" complexes ("open" chromatin), dense liquid-like assemblies (dynamic condensates) and higher-order structures (organised 30-nm fibres). A crucial advantage of such a simple model is that it allows the study of the various condensed states by NMR, CD and scattering methods. Moreover, it allows capture of the thermodynamics underpinning the transitions between states through calorimetry. We have leveraged this to rationalise the distinct condensing properties of linker histone subtypes and variants across species that are encoded by the amino acid content of their C-terminal tails. Three properties emerge as key to defining the condensed state: charge density, lysine/arginine ratio, and proline-free regions, and we evaluate each separately using a strategic mutagenesis approach.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.