Back

LightRoseTTA: High-efficient and Accurate Protein Structure Prediction Using an Ultra-Lightweight Deep Graph Model

Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, G.; Cui, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Long, C.; Zheng, W.; Yang, J.

2023-11-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.20.566676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurately predicting protein structure, from amino acid sequences to three-dimensional structures, is of great significance in biological research. To tackle this issue, a representative deep big model, RoseTTAFold, has been proposed with promising success. Here, we report an ultra-lightweight deep graph network, named LightRoseTTA, to achieve accurate and high-efficient prediction for proteins. Notably, three highlights are possessed by our LightRoseTTA: (i) high-accurate structure prediction for proteins, being competitive with RoseTTAFold on multiple popular datasets including CASP14 and CAMEO; (ii) high-efficient training and inference with an ultra-lightweight model, costing only one week on one single general NVIDIA 3090 GPU for model-training (vs 30 days on 8 high-speed NVIDIA V100 GPUs for RoseTTAFold) and containing only 1.4M parameters (vs 130M in RoseTTAFold); (iii) low dependency on multi-sequence alignments (MSA, widely-used homologous information), achieving the best performance on three MSA-insufficient datasets: Orphan, De novo, and Orphan25. Besides, our LightRoseTTA is transferable from general proteins to antibody data, as verified in our experiments. We visualize some case studies to demonstrate the high-quality prediction, and provide some insights on how the structure predictions facilitate the understanding of biological functions. We further make a discussion on the time and resource costs of LightRoseTTA and RoseTTAFold, and demonstrate the feasibility of lightweight models for protein structure prediction, which may be crucial in the resource-limited research for universities and academy institutions. We release our code and model to speed biological research.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.