A collaborative network trial to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies to maximise adoption of a school-based healthy lunchbox program: A study protocol
Barnes, C.; Jones, J.; Wolfenden, L.; Robertson, K.; Seidler, A. L.; Norman, J.; Budgen, P.; Mattingly, M.; Piliskic, C.; Moorhouse, L.; Mozina, J.; Plaskett, J.; McDermott, S.; Darney, S.; Vuong, C.; Douglass, N.; McDonnell, K.; Sutherland, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundSchools provide universal access to children over five years of age, representing a key opportunity for nutrition interventions to prevent the development of chronic disease. However, an important impediment to the large-scale adoption of evidence-based school nutrition interventions is the lack of evidence on effective strategies to implement them. This paper describes the protocol for a "Collaborative Network Trial" to support the simultaneous testing of different strategies undertaken by New South Wales Local Health Districts to facilitate the adoption of an effective school-based healthy lunchbox program ( SWAP IT). The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of different implementation strategies to increase school adoption of the SWAP across New South Wales Local Health Districts. MethodsWithin a Master Protocol framework, a collaborative network trial will be undertaken. Independent randomised controlled trials to test implementation strategies to increase school adoption of SWAP IT within primary schools in 10 different New South Wales Local Health Districts will occur. Schools within each Local Health District will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or control condition. Schools allocated to the intervention group will receive a combination of implementation strategies developed by each of the Local Health Districts independently, based on their existing capacities and local contexts. Across the 10 participating Local Health Districts, six broad strategies were developed and combinations of these strategies will be executed over a 6 month period. In six districts an active comparison group (containing one or more implementation strategies) was selected. The primary outcome of the trial will be adoption of SWAP IT, assessed via electronic registration records captured automatically following online school registration to the program. The primary trial outcome, between-group differences at 6 month follow-up, will be assessed using logistic regression analyses for each trial. Individual participant data component network meta-analysis, under a Bayesian framework, will be used to explore strategy-covariate interactions; to model additive main effects (separate effects for each component of an implementation strategy); two way interactions (synergistic/antagonistic effects of components), and full interactions. DiscussionThe study will provide rigorous evidence of the effects of a variety of implementation strategies, employed in different contexts, on the adoption of a school-based healthy lunchbox program at scale. Importantly, it will also provide evidence as to whether health service-centred, collaborative research models can rapidly generate new knowledge and yield health service improvements.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
- Cohort Profile: Health and Attainment of Pupils in a Primary Education National-Cohort (HAPPEN). A hybrid total population cohort in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- Investigating the effectiveness of school health services delivered by a health provider: a systematic review of systematic reviews 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating implementation of LEAPS, a youth-led early childhood care and education intervention in rural Pakistan: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 95%
- The iHealth-T2D study: Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial with intensive family-based lifestyle modification programme to reduce type 2 diabetes risk amongst South Asians 92%
- Azithromycin mass drug administration to reduce child mortality in Niger (AVENIR II): a master protocol for a cluster-randomized adaptive platform trial to evaluate community-based health interventions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 94%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 92%
- Is the Healthy Start scheme associated with increased food expenditure in low-income families with young children in the United Kingdom? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multilevel estimation of the relative impacts of social determinants on income-related health inequalities in urban Canada: Protocol for the Canadian Social Determinants Urban Laboratory 90%
- Design and rationale of the Longitudinal Evaluation of Norms and Networks Study (LENNS): A cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of a norms-centric intervention on exclusive toilet use and maintenance in peri-urban communities of Tamil Nadu 89%
- Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.