Stroke Risk Prediction from Medical Survey Data: AI-Driven Risk Analysis with Insightful Feature Importance using Explainable AI (XAI)
Akter, S. B.; Akter, S.; Pias, T. S.
Show abstract
Prioritizing dataset dependability, model performance, and interoperability is a compelling demand for improving stroke risk prediction from medical surveys using AI in healthcare. These collective efforts are required to enhance the field of stroke risk assessment and demonstrate the transformational potential of AI in healthcare. This novel study leverages the CDCs recently published 2022 BRFSS dataset to explore AI-based stroke risk prediction. Numerous substantial and notable contributions have been established from this study. To start with, the datasets dependability is improved through a unique RF-based imputation technique that overcomes the challenges of missing data. In order to identify the most promising models, six different AI models are meticulously evaluated including DT, RF, GNB, RusBoost, AdaBoost, and CNN. The study combines topperforming models such as GNB, RF, and RusBoost using fusion approaches such as soft voting, hard voting, and stacking to demonstrate the combined prediction performance. The stacking model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an F1 score of 88%. The work also employs Explainable AI (XAI) approaches to highlight the subtle contributions of important dataset features, improving model interpretability. The comprehensive approach to stroke risk prediction employed in this study enhanced dataset reliability, model performance, and interpretability, demonstrating AIs fundamental impact in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of COVID-19 Mortality to Support Patient Prognosis and Triage and Limits of Current Open-Source Data 93%
- Predicting COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia Using Modified Singular Spectrum Analysis 91%
- Improving Tuberculosis Detection in Chest X-ray Images through Transfer Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 97%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 95%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 95%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 95%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.