Unravelling the neural dynamics of hypnotic susceptibility: Aperiodic neural activity as a central feature of hypnosis
Landry, M.; da Silva Castanheira, J.; Boisvert, C.; Rousseaux, F.; Sackur, J.; Raz, A.; Ogez, D.; Rainville, P.; Jerbi, K.
Show abstract
How well a person responds to hypnosis is a stable trait, which exhibits considerable inter-individual diversity across the general population. Yet, its neural underpinning remains elusive. Here, we address this gap by combining EEG data, multivariate statistics, and machine learning in order to identify brain patterns that differentiate between individuals high and low in susceptibility to hypnosis. In particular, we computed the periodic and aperiodic components of the EEG power spectrum, as well as graph theoretical measures derived from functional connectivity, from data acquired at rest (pre-induction) and under hypnosis (post-induction). We found that the 1/f slope of the EEG spectrum at rest was the best predictor of hypnotic susceptibility. Our findings support the idea that hypnotic susceptibility is a trait linked to the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition at baseline and offers novel perspectives on the neural foundations of hypnotic susceptibility. Future work can explore the contribution of background 1/f activity as a novel target to distinguish the responsiveness of individuals to hypnosis at baseline in the clinic. Significance StatementHypnotic phenomena reflect the ability to alter ones subjective experiences based on targeted verbal suggestions. This ability varies greatly in the population. The brain correlates to explain this variability remain elusive. Addressing this gap, our study employs machine learning to predict hypnotic susceptibility. By recording electroencephalography (EEG) before and after a hypnotic induction and analyzing diverse neurophysiological features, we were able to determine that several features differentiate between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals both at baseline and during hypnosis. Our analysis revealed that the paramount discriminative feature is non-oscillatory EEG activity before the induction--a new finding in the field. This outcome aligns with the idea that hypnotic susceptibility represents a latent trait observable through a plain five-minutes resting-state EEG.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain network motifs are markers of loss and recovery of consciousness 94%
- Broadband slow-wave modulation in posterior and anterior cortex tracks distinct states of propofol-induced unconsciousness 94%
- The Relationship between Stability of Interpersonal Coordination and Inter-Brain EEG Synchronization during Anti-phase Tapping 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recovery of Consciousness and Cognition after General Anesthesia in Humans 93%
- Boosting Brain Signal Variability Underlies Liberal Shifts in Decision Bias 93%
- Disruption in structural-functional network repertoire and time resolved subcortical-frontoparietal connectivity in disorders of consciousness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation 94%
- Expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception 92%
- Functional segregation of cortical hand and speech areas by frequency detuning of an intrinsic motor rhythm. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased signal diversity/complexity of spontaneous EEG in humans given sub-anaesthetic doses of ketamine 93%
- Cortical and autonomic responses during staged Taoist meditation: two distinct meditation strategies. 92%
- Characteristic changes in EEG spectral powers of patients with opioid-use disorder as compared with those with methamphetamine- and alcohol-use disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.