Back

Vaccinia virus infection induces concurrent alterations in host chromatin architecture, accessibility, and gene expression

Venu, V.; Roth, C.; Adikari, S. H.; Small, E. M.; Starkenburg, S. R.; Sanbonmatsu, K. Y.; Steadman, C. R.

2023-11-17 genomics
10.1101/2023.11.15.567280 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic DNA folds into complex configurations that produce particular local and global structures thought to profoundly impact genome function. To understand the dynamic nature of this relationship, we investigated the extent of host chromatin structural and functional changes in response to a viral agent. We performed comprehensive assessments of host architecture (Hi-C), accessibility (ATAC-seq), and gene expression (RNA-seq) in a paired manner in response to attenuated vaccinia (smallpox) virus. Over time, infection significantly increased long-range intra-chromosomal interactions and decreased chromatin accessibility. Fine-scale accessibility changes were independent of broad-scale chromatin compartment exchange, which increased (up to 12% of the genome) over time, underscoring potential independent mechanisms for global and local chromatin reorganization. The majority of differentially expressed genes, including those downregulated in immune responses, had concurrent alterations in local accessibility and loop domain restructuring. Increased B compartmentalization, intra-chromosomal interactions, and decreased inter-chromosomal interactions and chromatin accessibility together indicate that infection converts the host genome into a more condensed state with nearly equal bidirectional differential gene expression. These changes in host chromatin features may have implications for developing efficacious anti-viral countermeasures. Overall, our empirical data provides evidence of orchestrated concurrent alterations in chromatin architecture, accessibility, and gene expression in response to infection, further reinforcing the notion of coordinated structure-function dynamics of the genome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.