Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial of HD-DRUM, a rhythmic movement training application for cognitive and motor symptoms in people with Huntingtons disease.
Ioakeimidis, V.; Busse, M.; Drew, C.; Pallmann, P.; Jones, D.; Rosser, A.; Palombo, M.; Schubert, R.; Metzler-Baddeley, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionHuntingtons disease (HD) is an inherited neurodegenerative disease causing progressive cognitive and motor decline, largely due to basal ganglia (BG) atrophy. Rhythmic training offers promise as therapy to counteract BG-regulated deficits. We have developed HD-DRUM, a tablet-based app to enhance movement synchronization skills and improve cognitive and motor abilities in people with HD. This paper outlines a randomised controlled trial protocol to determine the feasibility of a larger effectiveness trial for HD-DRUM. Additionally, the trial investigates cognitive and motor function measures, along with brain microstructure, aiming to advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying training effects. Methods, Design & AnalysisFifty individuals with HD, confirmed by genetic testing, and a Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score of 9-13, will be recruited into a two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. Consenting individuals with HD will be randomised to the intervention group, which entails eight weeks of at-home usage of HD-DRUM, or a usual- activity control group. All participants will undergo cognitive and motor assessments, alongside ultra-strong gradient (300mT/m) brain microstructural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after the eight-week period. The feasibility assessment will encompass recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability of HD-DRUM following pre- specified criteria. The study will also evaluate variations in cognitive and motor performance and brain microstructure changes resulting from the intervention to determine effect size estimates for future sample size calculations. Ethics & DisseminationThe study has received favourable ethical opinion from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 2 (REC reference: 22/WA/0147) and is sponsored by Cardiff University (SPON1895-22) (Research Integrity, Governance and Ethics Team, Research & Innovation Services, Cardiff University, 2nd Floor, Lakeside Building, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW). Findings will be disseminated to researchers and clinicians in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and to participants, carers and the general public via newsletters and public engagement activities. Data will be shared with the research community via the Enroll-HD platform. Trial registration & data set: ISRCTN 11906973 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11906973) Protocol: 01/11/2023 version 1.7 Strengths and limitationsO_LIHD-DRUM is a remotely accessible, tablet-based training tool that can be used at home and allows the objective assessment of adherence and training effects. C_LIO_LIThe use of gamification to match users practice to a level appropriate to their abilities is expected to increase adherence and acceptability of HD-DRUM by avoiding frustration and boredom due to over- and underchallenge. C_LIO_LIThis trial will assess the feasibility of a future fully powered effectiveness randomised controlled trial and any modifications that may need to be implemented in HD- DRUM. C_LIO_LIThe randomised controlled study design will allow the estimation of training-induced variability of changes in clinical and brain imaging measures, using state-of-the art ultra-strong gradient 3T MRI. C_LIO_LIDue to the nature of the intervention and limited resources, researchers and participants are not blinded to group allocation. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 94%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal neuroimaging data from a 5-week heart rate variability biofeedback randomized clinical trial 91%
- A longitudinal resource for studying connectome development and its psychiatric associations during childhood 91%
- The Mexican dataset of a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation clinical trial on cocaine use disorder patients: SUDMEX TMS 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 93%
- Protocol for Cerebellar Stimulation for Aphasia Rehabilitation (CeSAR): A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial 92%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The PREVENT Dementia programme: Baseline demographic, lifestyle, imaging and cognitive data from a midlife cohort study investigating risk factors for dementia 91%
- Spinal cord MRI and MRS Detect Early-stage Alterations and Disease Progression in Friedreich Ataxia 91%
- Beta Burst-Driven Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital gait biomarkers, but not clinical ataxia scores, allow to capture 1-year longitudinal change in Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) 91%
- Depression in Premanifest Huntingtons Disease: Aberrant Effective Connectivity of Striatum and Default Mode Network 91%
- Transcranial Pulse Stimulation Enhances Dexterity in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.