Multi-Modality Machine Learning Models to Predict Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure
Zhou, J.; Murugappan, L.; Lu, L.; Chou, O. H. I.; Cheung, B. M. Y.; Tse, G.; Zhu, T.
Show abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSIntroductionC_ST_ABSAtrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke are leading causes of death of heart failure patients. Several ML models have been built using electrocardiography (ECG)-only data, or lab test data or health record data to predict these outcomes. However, a multi-modal approach using wearable ECG data integrated with lab tests and electronic health records (EHRs) data has not been developed. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to apply machine learning techniques to predict stroke and AF amongst heart failure patients from a multi-modal dataset. MethodsThis study analysed hospitalised patients with heart failure in Hong Kong between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, with the last follow-up of 31 December 2019. The primary outcomes were AF and stroke. The secondary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. ECG-only, non-ECG-only and multimodal models were built to assess feature importance. Four machine learning classifiers and seven performance measures were used to evaluate the performance. ResultsThere are in total 2,868 subjects with heart failure upon admission, among them 1,150 (40.10%) had new onset AF, 668 (23.29%) had new onset stroke/TIA. It was found that accurate and sensitive machine learning models can be created to predict stroke and AF from multimodal data. XGBoost, which was the best algorithm tested, achieved a mean (over 10 iterations) accuracy, AUROC, AUPRC, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.89, 0.80, 0.74, 0.99 and 0.88, respectively, for stroke and 0.78, 0.82, 0.77, 0.77 and 0.79, respectively, for AF. The predictive models, built using multimodal data, were easy to use and had high accuracy. ConclusionMulti-modal machine learning models could be used to predict future stroke and AF occurrences in patients hospitalised for heart failure.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 96%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced machine learning and hybrid ensemble approaches for coronary heart disease prediction 95%
- Integrating feature importance techniques and causal inference to enhance early detection of heart disease 95%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Unplanned 30- day Readmission for ICU Patients with Heart Failure 97%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 96%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection and categorization of severe cardiac disorders based solely on pulse interval measurements 95%
- Metabolomic profile for understanding heart failure classifications 94%
- Integrating Bioinformatics and Machine Learning to Investigate the Mechanisms by Which Three Major Respiratory Infectious Diseases Exacerbate Heart Failure 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.