Back

Does stomatal patterning in amphistomatous leavesminimize the CO2 diffusion path length withinleaves?

Watts, J. L.; Dow, G. J.; Buckley, T. N.; Muir, C. D.

2023-11-14 plant biology
10.1101/2023.11.13.566960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Photosynthesis is co-limited by multiple factors depending on the plant and its environment. These include biochemical rate limitations, internal and external water potentials, temperature, irradiance, and carbon dioxide (CO2). Amphistomatous leaves have stomata on both abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces. This feature is considered an adaptation to alleviate CO2 diffusion limitations in productive environments where other factors are not limiting as the diffusion path length from stomate to chloroplast is effectively halved. Plants can also reduce CO2 limitations through other aspects of optimal stomatal anatomy: stomatal density, distribution, patterning, and size. A number of studies have demonstrated that stomata are overdispersed on a single leaf surface; however, much less is known about stomatal anatomy in amphistomatous leaves, especially the coordination between leaf surfaces, despite their prevelance in nature and near ubiquity among crop species. Here we use novel spatial statistics based on simulations and photosynthesis modeling to test hypotheses about how amphistomatous plants may optimize CO2 limitations in the model angiosperm Arabidopsis thaliana grown in different light environments. We find that 1) stomata are overdispersed, but not ideally dispersed, on both leaf surfaces across all light treatments; 2) abaxial and adaxial leaf surface patterning are independent; and 3) the theoretical improvements to photosynthesis from abaxial-adaxial stomatal coordination are miniscule (<< 1%) across the range of feasible parameter space. However, we also find that 4) stomatal size is correlated with the mesophyll volume that it supplies with CO2, suggesting that plants may optimize CO2 diffusion limitations through alternative pathways other than ideal, uniform stomatal spacing. We discuss the developmental, physical, and evolutionary constraits which may prohibit plants from reaching the theoretical adaptive peak of uniform stomatal spacing and inter-surface stomatal coordination. These findings contribute to our understanding of variation in the anatomy of amphistomatous leaves.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
16.7%
2
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.0%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.9%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
23
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%