High-throughput thermodynamic and kinetic measurements of transcription factor/DNA mutations reveal how conformational heterogeneity can shape motif selectivity
Fordyce, P. M.; Hastings, R.; Aditham, A.; DelRosso, N.; Suzuki, P.
Show abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) bind DNA sequences with a range of affinities, yet the mechanisms determining energetic differences between high- and low-affinity sequences ( selectivity) remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated two basic helix-loop-helix TFs, MAX (H. sapiens) and Pho4 (S. cerevisiae), that bind the same high-affinity sequence with highly similar nucleotide-contacting residues and bound structures but are differentially selective for non-cognate sequences. By measuring >1700 Kds and >500 rate constants for Pho4 and MAX mutant libraries binding multiple DNA sequences and comparing these measurements with thermodynamic and kinetic models, we identify the biophysical mechanisms by which changes to TF sequence alter both bound and unbound conformational ensembles to shape specificity landscapes. These results highlight the importance of conformational heterogeneity in determining sequence specificity and selectivity and can guide future efforts to engineer nucleic acid-binding proteins with enhanced selectivity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconciling competing models on the roles of condensates and soluble complexes in transcription factor function 97%
- The mechanistic basis for chromatin invasion and remodeling by the yeast pioneer transcription factor Rap1 96%
- Rapid two-step target capture ensures efficient CRISPR-Cas9-guided genome editing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic 1D Search and Processive Nucleosome Translocations by RSC and ISW2 Chromatin Remodelers 96%
- Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator 95%
- The interplay of RNA:DNA hybrid structure and G-quadruplexes determines the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.