Back

Methylome-wide association studies of traumatic physical injury identifies differential DNA methylation of synaptic plasticity and GABAergic-signalling.

Brown, J.; Marshall, S.; Walker, R.; Campbell, A.; Hayward, C.; McIntosh, A. M.; Evans, K. L.; Thomson, P. A.

2023-11-16 genomics
10.1101/2023.11.13.566835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traumatic physical injury is often associated with psychological trauma and is a risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD). In Generation Scotland traumatic injury was significantly associated with recurrent major depression (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.33-3.33, PLJ=LJ0.0016). and schizotypal symptoms, particularly disorganised thought ({beta}LJ=LJ0.111, 95% CI 0.049-0.177, PLJ=LJ0.0004). We performed methylome-wide analyses of traumatic injury in individuals with MDD and controls separately to investigate the link between traumatic injury and MDD. Nominally significant differences in differential DNA methylation between MDD and control groups were identified at 40 003 CpG sites (p < 0.05). Individuals with recurrent MDD showed significantly higher levels of DNA methylation associated with traumatic injury at CpG sites at the first exon and lower levels at exon boundaries, this was significant different to the association pattern at these sites in controls (mean difference in M-value = 0.0083, P = 21.1x10-10, and -0.0125, P = 2.1x10-174, respectively). Analyses at the level of CpG site, genes and gene ontologies implicated dysregulation of processes related to synaptic plasticity, including dendrite development, excitatory synapse and GABAergic signalling (normalised enrichment values > 2, FDR q-values < 0.01). Enrichment analyses for regional brain-expression in the recurrent MDD group highlight the limbic lobe and supraoptic nuclei (recurrent MDD FWER = 0.028 and 0.034, respectively). These results suggest that traumatic injury is associated with patterns of DNA methylation differentially in individuals with MDD compared to controls, highlighting the need for novel analysis approaches.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.