Back

Ability of calculated right adrenal vein aldosterone levels to identify the aldosterone-overproducing side in patients with primary aldosteronism undergoing adrenal venous sampling

Soonthornpun, S.; Tuandam, L.

2023-11-14 endocrinology
10.1101/2023.11.13.23298491 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroudAdrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a gold standard procedure to determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism. Unsuccessful cannulation of right adrenal vein (RAV) is a common problem in performing AVS. ObjectiveTo use calculated aldosterone concentration in the RAV (cAldoRAV) for identifying the dominant side of aldosterone secretion. DesignRetrospective study, 2011-2023. MethodsBased on the assumption that cortisol production from both adrenal glands is equal, aldosterone concentration in the RAV was calculated by using the data from left adrenal vein (LAV) and inferior vena cava. The aldosterone concentration in the LAV (AldoLAV) compared to the cAldoRAV (AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio) was then used to determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism. ResultsOf 117 patients with successful AVS, 95 (81.2%) had concordant results between adrenal imaging and AVS study and were used as the gold standard for studying diagnostic performance. The AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio with the cutoff values of [≥]3 and [≤]0.33 could identify unilateral diseases (left-sided and right-sided disease, respectively) with 93.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In 22 patients who had discordant results between adrenal imaging and standard AVS interpretation, 11 had concordant results when using the AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio. ConclusionsThe AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio can determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion with high sensitivity and specificity. It can not only be used for patients with unsuccessful cannulation of RAV but also increase the concordance rate in those who have discordance between adrenal imaging and standard AVS interpretation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%