Back

Dopamine neurons encode a multidimensional probabilistic map of future reward

Sousa, M.; Bujalski, P.; Cruz, B. F.; Louie, K.; McNamee, D.; Paton, J. J.

2023-11-13 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2023.11.12.566727 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Learning to predict rewards is a fundamental driver of adaptive behavior. Midbrain dopamine neurons (DANs) play a key role in such learning by signaling reward prediction errors (RPEs) that teach recipient circuits about expected rewards given current circumstances and actions. However, the algorithm that DANs are thought to provide a substrate for, temporal difference (TD) reinforcement learning (RL), learns the mean of temporally discounted expected future rewards, discarding useful information concerning experienced distributions of reward amounts and delays. Here we present time-magnitude RL (TMRL), a multidimensional variant of distributional reinforcement learning that learns the joint distribution of future rewards over time and magnitude using an efficient code that adapts to environmental statistics. In addition, we discovered signatures of TMRL-like computations in the activity of optogenetically identified DANs in mice during a classical conditioning task. Specifically, we found significant diversity in both temporal discounting and tuning for the magnitude of rewards across DANs, features that allow the computation of a two dimensional, probabilistic map of future rewards from just 450ms of neural activity recorded from a population of DANs in response to a reward-predictive cue. In addition, reward time predictions derived from this population code correlated with the timing of anticipatory behavior, suggesting the information is used to guide decisions regarding when to act. Finally, by simulating behavior in a foraging environment, we highlight benefits of access to a joint probability distribution of reward over time and magnitude in the face of dynamic reward landscapes and internal physiological need states. These findings demonstrate surprisingly rich probabilistic reward information that is learned and communicated to DANs, and suggest a simple, local-in-time extension of TD learning algorithms that explains how such information may be acquired and computed.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.