Temporal and spatial analysis of astrocytes following stroke identifies novel drivers of reactivity
Kim, R. D.; Marchildon, A. E.; Frazel, P. W.; Hasel, P.; Guo, A. X.; Liddelow, S.
Show abstract
Astrocytes undergo robust gene expression changes in response to a variety of perturbations, including ischemic injury. How these transitions are affected by time, and how heterogeneous and spatially distinct various reactive astrocyte populations are, remain unclear. To address these questions, we performed spatial transcriptomics as well as single nucleus RNAseq of [~]138,000 mouse forebrain astrocytes at 1, 3, and 14 days after ischemic injury. We observed a widespread and temporally diverse response across many astrocyte subtypes. We identified astrocyte clusters unique in injury, including a transiently proliferative substate that may be BRCA1-dependent. We also found an interferon-responsive population that rapidly expands to the perilesion cortex at 1 day and persists up to 14 days post stroke. These lowly abundant, spatially restricted populations are likely functionally important in post-injury stabilization and resolution. These datasets offer valuable insights into injury-induced reactive astrocyte heterogeneity and can be used to guide functional interrogation of biologically meaningful reactive astrocyte substates to understand their pro- and anti-reparative functions following acute injuries such as stroke.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared inflammatory glial cell signature after brain injury, revealed by spatial, temporal and cell-type-specific profiling of the murine cerebral cortex 96%
- Neural xenografts contribute to long-term recovery in stroke via molecular graft-host crosstalk 96%
- The transcriptional response of cortical neurons to concussion reveals divergent fates after injury 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.