Unraveling activation-related rearrangements and intrinsic divergence from ligand-induced conformational changes of the dopamine D3 and D2 receptors
Lee, K. H.; Shi, L.
Show abstract
Effective rational drug discovery targeting a specific protein hinges on understanding their functional states and distinguishing it from homologs. However, for the G protein coupled receptors, both the activation-related conformational changes (ACCs) and the intrinsic divergence among receptors can be misled or obscured by ligand-induced conformational changes (LCCs). Here, we unraveled ACCs and intrinsic divergence from LCCs of the dopamine D3 and D2 receptors (D3R and D2R), by analyzing their experimentally determined structures and the molecular dynamics simulation results of the receptors bound with different ligands. In addition to the ACCs common to other aminergic receptors, we revealed unique ACCs for these two receptors including TM5e and TM6e shifting away from TM2e and TM3e, with a subtle rotation of TM5e. In identifying intrinsic divergence, we found pronounced outward tilting of TM6e in the D2R compared to the D3R in both experimental structures and simulations with ligands in different scaffolds. This tilting was drastically reduced in the simulations of the receptors bound with nonselective full agonist quinpirole, suggesting a misleading impact of LCCs. Further, in the quinpirole-bound simulations, TM1 showed a greater disparity between these receptors, indicating that LCCs may obscure intrinsic divergence. In addition, our analysis showed that the impact of the nonconserved TM1 propagated to conserved Trp7.40 and Glu2.65, both are ligand binding residues. We also found that the D2R exhibited heightened flexibility compared to the D3R in the extracellular portions of TMs 5, 6, and 7, potentially associated with its greater ligand binding site plasticity. Our results lay the groundwork for crafting ligands specifically targeting D2R or D3R with more precise pharmacological profiles.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Allosteric effect of nanobody binding on ligand-specific active states of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor 98%
- Deep Mutational Scanning of Dynamic Interaction Networks in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes: Allosteric Hotspots Control Functional Mimicry and Resilience to Mutational Escape 97%
- Selective Activation of GPCRs: Molecular Dynamics Shows Siponimod Binds but Fails to Activate S1PR2 Unlike S1PR1 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Allosteric Cholesterol Site in Glycine Receptors Characterized Through Molecular Simulations 96%
- Coevolution-driven method for efficiently simulating conformational changes in proteins reveals molecular details of ligand effects in the beta2AR receptor 96%
- Coevolutionary Analysis and Perturbation-Based Network Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Complexes with Antibodies: Binding-Induced Control of Dynamics, Allosteric Interactions and Signaling 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revealing druggable cryptic pockets in the Nsp-1 of SARS-CoV-2 and other β-coronaviruses by simulations and crystallography 96%
- Hidden GPCR structural transitions addressed by multiple walker supervised molecular dynamics (mwSuMD) 95%
- Evolutionary Divergence in the Conformational Landscapes of Tyrosine vs Serine/Threonine Kinases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-state Modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors at Experimental Accuracy 97%
- Molecular Dynamics Analysis of a Flexible Loop at the Binding Interface of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain 96%
- REV-ERBβ Binding Pocket Dynamics with Implications for Rational Design of Small Molecule Modulators 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.