Back

Clinical and Economic impact of updated Fall 2023 COVID-19 vaccines in the Immunocompromised Population in Canada

Lee, A.; Jayasundara, K.; Kohli, M.; Maschio, M.; Fust, K.; Joshi, K.; Van de Velde, N.; Beck, E.

2023-11-11 health economics
10.1101/2023.11.10.23298369 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Immunocompromised (IC) individuals are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection-related severe outcomes. Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are available in Canada, and differences in vaccine effectiveness (VE) have been found between the two in IC individuals. The objective of this analysis was to compare the clinical and economic impact of a Moderna XBB.1.5 updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 vaccine to a Pfizer-BioNTech XBB.1.5 updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 vaccine in Canadian IC individuals aged [≥]18 years. MethodsA static decision-analytic model estimated the number of COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, deaths, and resulting quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a one-year time horizon (September 2023-August 2024) in the Canadian IC adult population (n=894,580). Costs associated with COVID-19 infection were estimated from health care and societal perspectives. The predicted VE of the updated Moderna vaccine was based on prior variant versions, which were well-matched to the circulating variant. Pfizer-BioNTech VE was calculated based on a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness between both vaccines (relative risk for Moderna vaccine: infection=0.85 [95%CI 0.75-0.97], hospitalization=0.88 [95%CI 0.79-0.97]). The model combined VE estimates with COVID-19 incidence and probability of COVID-19 related severe outcomes. Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of uncertainty surrounding incidence, hospitalization and mortality rates, costs, and QALYs. ResultsGiven the expected higher VE against infection and hospitalizations with the Moderna Fall 2023 vaccine, its use is predicted to prevent an additional 2,411 infections (3.6%), 275 hospitalizations (3.7%), and 47 deaths (4.0%) compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech Fall 2023 vaccine, resulting in 330 QALYs gained, and savings of $7.4M in infection treatment costs, and $0.9M in productivity loss costs. Results were most sensitive to variations in VE parameters, specifically the relative risk of infection and hospitalizations between the vaccines, and waning rates. ConclusionsIf the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech Fall 2023 vaccines protect against infection and hospitalizations similar to previous vaccines, using the Moderna Fall 2023 vaccine would result in substantial public health benefits in IC individuals, as well as provide health care and societal cost savings.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%