Back

Structural and biochemical requirements for secretory component interactions with dimeric Immunoglobulin A

Kumar Bharathkar, S.; Stadtmueller, B. M.

2023-11-13 immunology
10.1101/2023.11.09.566401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Secretory (S) Immunoglobulin (Ig) A is the predominant mucosal antibody that protects host epithelial barriers and promotes microbial homeostasis. SIgA production occurs when plasma cells assemble two copies of monomeric IgA and one joining-chain (JC) to form dimeric (d) IgA, which is bound by the polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR) on the basolateral surface of epithelial cells and transcytosed to the apical surface. There, pIgR is proteolytically cleaved, releasing SIgA, a complex of the dIgA and the pIgR ectodomain, called secretory component (SC). The pIgRs five Ig-like domains (D1-D5) undergo a conformational change upon binding dIgA, ultimately contacting four IgA heavy chains and the JC in SIgA. Here we report structure-based mutational analysis combined with surface plasmon resonance binding assays that identify key residues in mouse SC D1 and D3 that mediate SC binding to dIgA. Residues in D1 CDR3 are likely to initiate binding whereas residues that stabilize the D1-D3 interface are likely to promote the conformation change and stabilize the final SIgA structure. Additionally, we find that the JCs three C-terminal residues play a limited role in dIgA assembly but a significant role in pIgR/SC binding to dIgA. Together results inform new models for the intricate mechanisms underlying IgA transport across epithelia and functions in the mucosa. KEY POINTSO_LIThe secretory component D1 CDR3 loop plays an important role in binding to dIgA. C_LIO_LIThe formation of SC D1-D3 interface stabilizes SIgA. C_LIO_LIJC C-terminal residues influence dIgA assembly and mediate pIgR binding to dIgA. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.