Back

Combinatorial in silico approach for cancer-associated 4Fe-4S protein discovery

Tam, W. W. L.; Cheng, M. H. W.; Mo, X.; He, B.-B.; Ngo, U. F. M.; Yuen, N. M. H.; Yau, A. Y. L.; Wu, N. C.; Tse, E. C. M.

2023-11-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.08.566327 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) proteins play vital roles in multiple cellular processes, including mediating redox balance as well as DNA replication and repair. Given the role of Fe-S cofactors in genome maintenance, mutations in such metalloproteins could be associated with cancer. Nevertheless, only a few cancer-associated Fe-S proteins have been identified. In vitro, Fe-S cluster is susceptible to degradation in oxic environment. It could also be replaced by other metal ions during protein purification, mis-labelled as zinc finger or Zn-containing proteins. In silico, bioinorganic Fe-S cluster lacks unique sequence characteristics that distinguish itself from other metal-coordination sites, making motif prediction based solely on protein sequence difficult. Thus, in this study, three traits have been employed to discover putative cancer-associated 4Fe-4S proteins. Here, we have analyzed the human proteome via a three-pronged approach: (i) the presence of a triamino acid motif, (ii) the geometric arrangements of the cysteines, and (iii) the mutations of cancer-associated cysteines. In addition to MUTYH, a known 4Fe-4S human DNA glycosylase, 21 novel proteins were discovered as potential cancer-associated 4Fe-4S proteins. While 6 receptor proteins and 3 growth factors have been identified as potential targets in this study, 5 histone lysine methyltransferases with SET domains were also predicted to contain 4Fe-4S metallocofactors. This work provides insights for rational adjustments in experimental design and novel cancer biomarker discovery.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.