The impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the likelihood of children identified as sources of infection in the NIH workforce: a cohort study
van Loben Sels, J. M.; Bailin, H. B.; Bell, M. R.; McCormick-Ell, J.; McGann, M.; Das, S.; Roder, A. E.; Ghedin, E.; Castel, A. D.; D. Rebecca, P.; Kwan, J. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundChildren (<18 years old) were not initially considered significant sources of infection (SOIs) for SARS-CoV-2. Risk mitigation strategies were thus prioritized for adults, and vaccination was inaccessible for children until mid-2021. Emergence of novel variants led to significant increases in COVID-19 cases in both children and adults. Whether these emergence events and increased vulnerability of unvaccinated children had a synergistic effect resulting in increased caseloads in adults requires further exploration. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among 3,545 workers diagnosed with COVID-19. Case details were compiled during contact investigations. Variants of concern were identified following sequencing of biological samples collected through employer-based testing programs. Logistic regression was performed to compare the odds of having a child SOI based on the dominant variant in the workforce. ResultsOne-fourth (24.5%) of the cohort reported having a child in-residence; 11.2% identified a child as their SOI. In Alpha-dominant months, the odds of having a child SOI were 0.3, and the child SOI was likely older (5-17 years old). The odds of having a child SOI increased to 1.3 and 2.2 in Delta- and Omicron-dominant months, respectively. The odds of having younger child SOIs (<5 years old) were significantly higher in Omicron-dominant months. ConclusionsChildren were highly likely to acquire the virus and posed a significant risk of transmission to their adult caretakers during Delta- and Omicron-dominant months. Without proper mitigation strategies in both the home and the workplace, child-associated transmission can threaten operations in the forms of staff shortages. What is already known on this topicIncreases in transmission trends related to SARs-CoV-2 Variants of Concern have been documented in the literature at the population level and in workplaces. What this study addsThis study looks more closely at the role that children played in transmission to adult workers, and therefore their potential to seed transmission outside of the home. This interface of transmission has been neglected in the literature but is key for future policy development. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyTransmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children to their caretakers may cause significantly increased odds of infection in a worker population. This may have second order effects for staffing, particularly in workgroups with employees of childbearing age. Employers should consider this in the design of their policies for continuity of operations, telework, and leave.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of upper respiratory Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization with SARS-CoV-2 infection among adults 94%
- Comparing dynamics and determinants of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions among health care workers of adult and pediatric settings in central Paris 93%
- Frequency of routine testing for COVID-19 in high-risk environments to reduce workplace outbreaks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Time to Self-reported COVID-19 Infection Among a Large Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Population in the Southeastern United States 95%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Fatalities among Working Californians 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence among Healthcare Workers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multidimensional cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 seroprevalence among a police officer cohort: The PoliCOV-19 study 94%
- Seroprevalence and Correlates of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Healthcare Workers in Chicago 93%
- Prevalence and factors associated with antigen test positivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Los Angeles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-occupational and occupational factors associated with specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Hospital Workers – a multicentre cross-sectional study 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 Exposures of Healthcare Workers from Primary Care, Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals: A Nationwide Matched Case-Control Study 92%
- Cumulative seroprevalence among healthcare workers after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, Central America 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupation, Work-Related Contact, and SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Nucleocapsid Serological Status: Findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 94%
- Incidence of outbreak-associated COVID-19 cases by industry in Ontario, Canada, April 1, 2020-March 31, 2021 94%
- Occupational risks of COVID-19 in NHS workers in England 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.