New learning principles emerge from biomimetic computational primitives
Pathak, A.; Brincat, S. L.; Organtzidis, H.; Strey, H. H.; Senneff, S.; Antzoulatos, E. G.; Mujica-Parodi, L. R.; Miller, E. K.; Granger, R.
Show abstract
Although computational models have deepened our understanding of neuroscience, it is still highly challenging to link actual low-level physiological activity (spiking, field potentials) and biochemistry (transmitters and receptors) with high-level cognitive abilities (decision-making, working memory) nor with corresponding disorders. We introduce an anatomically-organized multi-scale model directly generating simulated physiology from which extended neural and cognitive phenomena emerge. The model produces spiking, fields, phase synchronies, and synaptic change, directly generating working memory, decisions, and categorization, all of which were then validated on extensive experimental macaque data from which the model received zero prior training of any kind. Moreover, the simulation uncovered a previously unknown neural code specifically predicting upcoming erroneous ("incongruous") behaviors, also subsequently confirmed in empirical data. The biomimetic model thus directly and predictively links novel decision and reinforcement signals, of computational interest, with novel spiking and field codes, of potential behavioral and clinical relevance.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spiking attractor model of motor cortex explains modulation of neural and behavioral variability by prior target information 98%
- Interleaving asynchronous and synchronous activity in balanced cortical networks with short-term synaptic depression 97%
- Theory of spontaneous persistent activity and inactivity in vivo reveals differential cortico-entorhinal functional connectivity 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.