Back

Heritability within groups is uninformative about differences among groups: cases from behavioral, evolutionary, and statistical genetics

Schraiber, J. G.; Edge, M. D.

2024-02-12 genetics
10.1101/2023.11.06.565864 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Without the ability to control or randomize environments (or genotypes), it is difficult to determine the degree to which observed phenotypic differences between two groups of individuals are due to genetic vs. environmental differences. However, some have suggested that these concerns may be limited to pathological cases, and methods have appeared that seem to give--directly or indirectly--some support to claims that aggregate heritable variation within groups can be related to heritable variation among groups. We consider three families of approaches: the "between-group heritability" sometimes invoked in behavior genetics, the statistic PST used in empirical work in evolutionary quantitative genetics, and methods based on variation in ancestry in an admixed population, used in anthropological and statistical genetics. We take up these examples to show mathematically that information on within-group genetic and phenotypic information in the aggregate cannot separate among-group differences into genetic and environmental components, and we provide simulation results that support our claims. We discuss these results in terms of the long-running debate on this topic.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.8%
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
6
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
10
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%