Contexts facilitate dynamic value encoding in the mesolimbic dopamine system
Fraser, K. M.; Collins, V. L.; Wolff, A. R.; Ottenheimer, D. J.; Bornhoft, K. N.; Pat, F.; Chen, B. J.; Janak, P. H.; Saunders, B. T.
Show abstract
Adaptive behavior in a dynamic environment often requires rapid revaluation of stimuli that deviates from well-learned associations. The divergence between stable value-encoding and appropriate behavioral output remains a critical test to theories of dopamines function in learning, motivation, and motor control. Yet how dopamine neurons are involved in the revaluation of cues when the world changes to alter our behavior remains unclear. Here we make use of pharmacology, in vivo electrophysiology, fiber photometry, and optogenetics to resolve the contributions of the mesolimbic dopamine system to the dynamic reorganization of reward-seeking. Male and female rats were trained to discriminate when a conditioned stimulus would be followed by sucrose reward by exploiting the prior, non-overlapping presentation of a separate discrete cue - an occasion setter. Only when the occasion setters presentation preceded the conditioned stimulus did the conditioned stimulus predict sucrose delivery. As a result, in this task we were able to dissociate the average value of the conditioned stimulus from its immediate expected value on a trial-to-trial basis. Both the activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons and dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens were essential for rats to successfully update behavioral responding in response to the occasion setter. Moreover, dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens following the conditioned stimulus only occurred when the occasion setter indicated it would predict reward. Downstream of dopamine release, we found that single neurons in the nucleus accumbens dynamically tracked the value of the conditioned stimulus. Together these results reveal a novel mechanism within the mesolimbic dopamine system for the rapid revaluation of motivation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dopamine supports reward prediction to shape reward-pursuit strategy 98%
- The medial orbitofrontal cortex - basolateral amygdala circuit regulates the influence of reward cues on adaptive behavior and choice 98%
- Prior cocaine exposure increases firing to immediate reward while attenuating cue and context signals related to reward value in anterior insula 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dopamine in the Dorsal Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis signals Pavlovian sign-tracking and reward violations 98%
- A bidirectional corticoamygdala circuit for the encoding and retrieval of detailed reward memories 98%
- The Paraventricular Thalamus is a Critical Mediator of Top-down Control of Cue-motivated Behavior in Rats 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Partially dissociable roles of the Orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal Hippocampus in context-dependent (hierarchical) reward predictions and contextual inference in learning 97%
- Dopamine neurons drive spatiotemporally heterogeneous striatal dopamine signals during learning 97%
- Reward and punishment contingency shifting reveals distinct roles for VTA dopamine and GABA neurons in behavioral flexibility 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drug Reinforcement Impairs Cognitive Flexibility by Inhibiting Striatal Cholinergic Neurons 98%
- Reward integration in prefrontal-cortical and ventral-hippocampal nucleus accumbens inputs cooperatively modulates engagement 97%
- Noradrenergic alpha-2a Receptor Stimulation Enhances Prediction Error Signaling in Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Striatum 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm. 97%
- Sex differences in behavioral responding and dopamine release during Pavlovian learning 96%
- A common stay-on-goal mechanism in anterior cingulate cortex for information and effort choices 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.