Delay in Door-to-door-to-balloon time for Primary PCI is rarely Related to Cardiologists Late Arrival
Movahed, M. R.; Irilouzadian, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionInterventional cardiologists are held accountable for delay in the door-to-balloon time (DBT) for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) even though in the chain of STEMI activation, the interventional cardiologist is the last person that needs to be available to start angiography. The goal of our study is to conduct a thorough analysis of the DBT data to assess time delays by randomly evaluating two consecutive years at the University of Arizona Medical Center (UAMC). METHODSWe evaluated all available DBT data for STEMIs occurring in the fiscal years of 2011 and 2012 at the UAMC and calculated the time needed for the cardiologist to start the procedure after the patient was ready in the cardiac catheterization laboratory called Time to start the procedure (TSP) in addition to other time intervals. RESULTSMean TSP time was 4 minutes and 24 seconds, one of the shortest time delays in the chain of STEMI activation and DBT. The median TSP delay was 3 minutes. The longest delay interval was the STEMI teams arrival to with a mean of 17 minutes and 38 seconds. CONCLUSIONSOur data is the first to evaluate delays related to DBT revealing the least delay occurring due to the late arrival of Interventional cardiologists. Our data emphasizes the importance of performing a detailed time analysis of the DBT delay in order to objectively determine the actual areas of delay and provide a future pathway to improve them since we have specifically detected a delay in STEMI team and patient arrival to the catheterization laboratory as the main delay in the DBT time. in order to avoid blaming the wrong person and find the true root cause of the delay.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 96%
- Stent For Life Initiative in Portugal: progress through years and Covid-19 Impact 95%
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Patient Screening for Self-Expanding Percutaneous Pulmonary Valves using Virtual Reality 94%
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 96%
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 93%
- Assessing Attitudes and Perceptions of High-risk, Low-resource Communities towards Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Public-access Defibrillation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 95%
- Referral for Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Result of Quality Outcome Project 94%
- Factors Associated with Delayed Hospital Arrival after Stroke Onset: An Observational Study in Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Results of the inoperable and operable with aortic valve endocarditis 96%
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 95%
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.