Multiple Sclerosis in the Digital Health Age: Challenges and Opportunities - A Systematic Review
Specht, B.; Jager, H.; Garbaya, S.; Pincherle, A.; Sarvari, P. A.; Khadraoui, D.; Schneider, R.; Chavarriaga, R.; TAYEB, Z.
Show abstract
In recent times, we have unequivocally witnessed a push towards digitising the healthcare system. Topics such as remote patient monitoring (RPM), digital health, and their use to monitor neurological disease progression have gained momentum and popularity. Notwithstanding the considerable advances that have been made in adopting such technologies and using them in the context of mental health or even a few neurodegenerative disease monitoring, they have not been widely used in the context of remote management and treatment of multiple sclerosis MS. In the same vein, given that (MS) is a very individualized disease to manage, there are numerous challenges yet opportunities associated with using digital health technologies for remote MS monitoring. This paper reviews the different research work and clinical attempts performed over the last decade (both home & hospital-based monitoring) en route to using digital health for MS monitoring and management. Similarly, this systematic review discusses the main challenges and barriers to translating that research from clinics into homes and highlights the opportunities in that context. Throughout this extensive review, we shine a light on various monitoring methods that hold the potential to be measured in a home environment, including electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potentials (e.g., motor evoked potential (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and visual evoked potential (VEP)), electromyography (EMG), inertial measurement unit (IMU), and speech analysis. Combining such digital biomarkers could pave the way for developing a more personalised treatment for MS patients, thereby stopping its progression and avoiding silent MS disability. Adopting digital health for remote monitoring and management could also chart a route ahead for a new era of personalised medicine for MS patients and potentially other brain disorder patients.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexibility of brain dynamics is increased and predicts clinical impairment in Relapsing-Remitting but not in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis 93%
- The sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to multiple sclerosis lesions 91%
- Spinal Cord Versus Brain Imaging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis Trajectory Combining 7T and 3T MRI 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartphone Postural Sway and Pronator Drift tests as Measures of Neurological Disability 93%
- A self-administered, artificial intelligence (AI) platform for cognitive assessment in multiple sclerosis (MS) 93%
- Machine Learning Analysis of Motor Evoked Potential Time Series to Predict Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 92%
- Optical coherence tomography assessment of axonal and neuronal damage of the retina in patients with familial and sporadic multiple sclerosis 90%
- Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Causes Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Mice 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartphone-Based Symbol-Digit Modalities Test Reliably Measures Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients 93%
- Digital health technologies and machine learning augment patient reported outcomes to remotely characterise rheumatoid arthritis 90%
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.