From Genomics Data to Causality: An Integrated Pipeline for Mendelian Randomization
Sharma, J.; Jangale, V.; Swain, A. K.; Yadav, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundMendelian randomization (MR) has emerged as a valuable tool for causal inference in genetic epidemiology. Existing MR methods have issues related to pleiotropy and offer limited comprehensiveness. Here, we introduce an integrated MR analysis pipeline designed for GWAS summary statistics data. Our pipeline integrates feature selection, harmonization, and checkpoint mechanisms to improve the accuracy and reliability of MR analysis. MethodsIn classical GWAS, the p-value threshold usually does not guarantee to identify causal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In such cases, t-statistics can be considered as imperative and robust criteria for identifying causal SNPs. Therefore, in this study, we computed the t-statistic for all independent SNPs remained after linkage disequilibrium pruning. Next, prior to harmonization, we removed SNPs having a t-statistic below the average t-statistic value. Furthermore, our pipeline incorporates sensitivity analysis tests at each step to reduce the chances of directional pleiotropy. Result and ConclusionWe applied our pipeline to single-sample and two-sample MR study designs, encompassing diverse populations and a wide range of diseases. Our results demonstrate superior performance compared to existing MR methods. In conclusion, our research presents an integrated MR analysis pipeline that significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of MR studies. By outperforming existing methods and providing comprehensive validation, this pipeline represents a valuable tool for researchers in genetics and epidemiology.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of obesity-related traits on COVID-19 severe respiratory symptoms is mediated by socioeconomic status: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study 94%
- An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization 93%
- Estimation of time-varying causal effects with multivariable Mendelian randomization: some cautionary notes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the performance of genome-wide association studies for predicting disease risk 96%
- Both general- and central- obesity are causally associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome: Findings of a Mendelian randomization study 95%
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation 93%
- Associations of polygenic inheritance of physical activity with aerobic fitness, cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases: the HUNT Study 91%
- Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multivariate analysis of a missense variant in CREBRF reveals associations with measures of adiposity in people of Polynesian ancestries 94%
- Quantifying posterior effect size distribution of susceptibility loci by common summary statistics 94%
- Use of genetic correlations to examine selection bias 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 92%
- Using linear and natural cubic splines, SITAR, and latent trajectory models to characterise nonlinear longitudinal growth trajectories in cohort studies 91%
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.