Back

Robust spatiotemporal organization of mitotic events in mechanically perturbed C. elegans embryos

Borne, V.; Weiss, M.

2023-11-05 developmental biology
10.1101/2023.11.03.565455 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early embryogenesis of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans progresses in an autonomous fashion within a protective chitin eggshell. Cell division timing and the subsequent, mechanically guided positioning of cells is virtually invariant between individuals, especially before gastrulation. Here, we have challenged this stereotypical developmental program in early stages by mechanically perturbing the embryo, without breaking its eggshell. Compressing embryos to about 2/3 of their unperturbed diameter only resulted in markedly slower cell divisions. In contrast, compressing embryos to half of their native diameter frequently resulted in a loss of cytokinesis, yielding a non-natural syncytium that still allowed for multiple divisions of nuclei. Although the orientation of mitotic axes was strongly altered in the syncytium, key features of division timing and spatial arrangement of nuclei remained surprisingly similar to unperturbed embryos in the first few division cycles. This suggests that few, very robust mechanisms provide a basic and resilient program for safeguarding the early embryogenesis of C. elegans. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEEarly embryogenesis of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans progresses in an autonomous fashion within a protective chitin eggshell. Cell division timing and cell positioning seemingly runs on autopilot, yielding a stereotypical development. Compressive forces, a potential hazard in the nematodes native habitat, may jeopardize this. We show that compressing embryos to 2/3 of their native diameter results in markedly slower cell divisions but leaves the early embryonic program otherwise intact. Further compression of embryos impairs the formation of new cells while nuclei still divide in a common cytoplasm (syncytium) with basic features of division timing and spatial arrangement being surprisingly similar to unperturbed embryos. This suggests that few robust mechanisms provide a basic program for the early embryonic autopilot.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
12
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
20
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%