Back

Apobec-Mediated Retroviral Hypermutation In Vivo is Dependent on Mouse Strain

Byun, H.; Singh, G. B.; Xu, W. K.; Das, P.; Reyes, A.; Battenhouse, A.; Wylie, D. C.; Lozano, M. M.; Dudley, J. P.

2023-11-02 microbiology
10.1101/2023.11.02.565355 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Replication of the complex retrovirus mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) is antagonized by murine Apobec3 (mA3), a member of the Apobec family of cytidine deaminases. We have shown that MMTV-encoded Rem protein inhibits proviral mutagenesis by the Apobec enzyme, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) during viral replication in BALB/c mice. To further study the role of Rem in vivo, we have infected C57BL/6 (B6) mice with a superantigen-independent lymphomagenic strain of MMTV (TBLV-WT) or a mutant strain (TBLV-SD) that is defective in Rem and its cleavage product Rem-CT. Unlike MMTV, TBLV induced T-cell tumors in {micro}MT mice, indicating that mature B cells, which express the highest AID levels, are not required for TBLV replication. Compared to BALB/c, B6 mice were more susceptible to TBLV infection and tumorigenesis. The lack of Rem expression accelerated B6 tumorigenesis at limiting doses compared to TBLV-WT in either wild-type B6 or AID-deficient mice. However, unlike proviruses from BALB/c mice, high-throughput sequencing indicated that proviral G-to-A or C-to-T changes did not significantly differ in the presence and absence of Rem expression. Ex vivo stimulation showed higher levels of mA3 relative to AID in B6 compared to BALB/c splenocytes, but effects of agonists differed in the two strains. RNA-Seq revealed increased transcripts related to growth factor and cytokine signaling in TBLV-SD-induced tumors relative to those from TBLV-WT, consistent with a third Rem function. Thus, Rem-mediated effects on tumorigenesis in B6 mice are independent of Apobec-mediated proviral hypermutation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.