Back

The Influence of Knee Varus Deformity on the Kinematic and Dynamic Characteristics of Musculoskeletal Models During Gait

Tabeiy, S.; Karimpour, M.; Shirvani, A.; Sherafat Vaziri, A.

2023-11-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.11.02.565254 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMusculoskeletal modeling has paved the way of measuring kinematic and kinetic variables during motions. Nonetheless, since the commonly-used generic models are created based on averaged data; thus, they cannot accurately mimic subjects with skeletal deformities. To overcome this obstacle, one can build personalized models based on subjects MRI or CT scan data, which is both time and money consuming. The other promising way is to manipulate generic models and create semi-personalized models to match with the individuals skeletal system at the joint of interest. Research QuestionCan a semi-personalized model reduce marker error in gait analysis? How a semi-personalized model differentiates the ROM of the lower limb joints and muscle activation pattern while having varus deformity? MethodWe developed the varus-valgus tool (freely available on: https://simtk.org/projects/var-val-tool) in MATLAB using OpenSim Application Programming Interface (API) to incorporate varus-valgus deformity in the generic OpenSim models. A 36-year-old female subject with a complaint of knee pain participated in our study. The subject had 6.5 and 11.9 degrees of varus in the right and left leg, respectively. A semi-personalized model of the subject was first created using generic OpenSim models. Then, markers error during Inverse Kinematic (IK), joints Range of Motion (ROM) and the activation of Tensor Fasciae Latae (TFL), a knee adductor, and Gracilis, a knee abductor, were calculated and compared between a semi-personalized model and a generic model. ResultsSignificant difference was observed in markers error during IK between generic and semipersonalized models (p<0.05). Substantial alterations were found in the ROM of the hip, knee and ankle joints while using semi-personalized model. Moreover, the activation pattern of TFL experienced a dramatic rise whereas Gracilis saw a fall during each gait cycle in semi-personalized models. SignificanceImplementing varus-valgus deformity in the generic models substantially reduces markers error which leads to more accurate results. It was observed that semi-personalized models showed different ROM compared to generic ones.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.