The Influence of Knee Varus Deformity on the Kinematic and Dynamic Characteristics of Musculoskeletal Models During Gait
Tabeiy, S.; Karimpour, M.; Shirvani, A.; Sherafat Vaziri, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundMusculoskeletal modeling has paved the way of measuring kinematic and kinetic variables during motions. Nonetheless, since the commonly-used generic models are created based on averaged data; thus, they cannot accurately mimic subjects with skeletal deformities. To overcome this obstacle, one can build personalized models based on subjects MRI or CT scan data, which is both time and money consuming. The other promising way is to manipulate generic models and create semi-personalized models to match with the individuals skeletal system at the joint of interest. Research QuestionCan a semi-personalized model reduce marker error in gait analysis? How a semi-personalized model differentiates the ROM of the lower limb joints and muscle activation pattern while having varus deformity? MethodWe developed the varus-valgus tool (freely available on: https://simtk.org/projects/var-val-tool) in MATLAB using OpenSim Application Programming Interface (API) to incorporate varus-valgus deformity in the generic OpenSim models. A 36-year-old female subject with a complaint of knee pain participated in our study. The subject had 6.5 and 11.9 degrees of varus in the right and left leg, respectively. A semi-personalized model of the subject was first created using generic OpenSim models. Then, markers error during Inverse Kinematic (IK), joints Range of Motion (ROM) and the activation of Tensor Fasciae Latae (TFL), a knee adductor, and Gracilis, a knee abductor, were calculated and compared between a semi-personalized model and a generic model. ResultsSignificant difference was observed in markers error during IK between generic and semipersonalized models (p<0.05). Substantial alterations were found in the ROM of the hip, knee and ankle joints while using semi-personalized model. Moreover, the activation pattern of TFL experienced a dramatic rise whereas Gracilis saw a fall during each gait cycle in semi-personalized models. SignificanceImplementing varus-valgus deformity in the generic models substantially reduces markers error which leads to more accurate results. It was observed that semi-personalized models showed different ROM compared to generic ones.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Firefighter Helmets and Cervical Intervertebral Kinematics: An OpenSim-Based Biomechanical Study 96%
- Repeatability of gait of children with spastic cerebral palsy in different walking conditions 96%
- Automatic Generation of Personalised Skeletal Models of the Lower Limb from Three-Dimensional Bone Geometries 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanical Efficiency Investigation of an ankle-assisted robot for human walking with a backpack-load 96%
- Optimum Push-off During Uneven Walking for Just-in-Time Strategy; Delayed Push-off Exertion is Mechanically Costly 94%
- Acute repair of meniscus root tear partially restores joint displacements as measured with MRI and loading in a porcine knee 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparable behaviour of ring and little fingers due to an artificial reduction in thumb contribution to hold objects 94%
- Predicting the risk of sarcopenia in elderly patients with patellar fracture: Development and assessment of a new predictive nomogram 94%
- Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulating human foot mechanics during walking based on an anatomically detailed forward dynamic finite element model 96%
- Muscle Moment Arm-Joint Angle Relations in the Hip, Knee, and Ankle: A Visualization of Datasets 95%
- Musculotendon Parameters in Lower Limb Models: Simplifications, Uncertainties, and Muscle Force Estimation Sensitivity 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.